- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The Only Thing Atlanta Got Correct..
Posted on 1/25/18 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 1/25/18 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 1/25/18 at 2:45 pm to LakeChuckTiger89
quote:
Steve Cannon, CEO of the AMB Group, Blank's holding company, told ESPN that although food and beverage prices were 50 percent lower in its new Mercedes-Benz Stadium than the prices in the Georgia Dome the previous year, fans spent 16 percent more.
So they lost money. Tell me the difference in profit margin and not sales. None of these rich fricks are going to do shite unless it makes them more money.
Posted on 1/25/18 at 2:50 pm to BigPerm30
??? Did you read the article? It clearly says they made more money by lowering prices.
Posted on 1/25/18 at 2:51 pm to LakeChuckTiger89
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 1/25/18 at 2:53 pm to LakeChuckTiger89
quote:
fans spent 16 percent more.
quote:
prices lowered by 50 percent
yeah, we're going to need a calculator and see the maf here, not just some vague fluff piece.
Posted on 1/25/18 at 2:56 pm to LakeChuckTiger89
quote:
Also if you take a look at your quote it clearly says fans spent 16 percent more.
Let’s go through a simple example.
Old pricing
Hotdog cost - $2.00
Hotdog price - $6.00
Profit per hotdog - $4.00
New Pricing
Hotdog cost - $2.00
Hotdog price-$3.00
Profit per hotdog - $1.00
Old price
100 hotdog with $4.00 margin is $400
New pricing
116 hotdogs with $1.00 margin is $116
I’m no economist but I think the owners made more money on the old pricing.
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 1/25/18 at 2:57 pm to Chad504boy
They didn't buy 16% more food. It's saying they spent 16% more money than last year.
The problem is that it doesn't take into account food costs and how much they spent on that last year vs. this year.
So in the end this still likely cost them money rather than making more money. You can't look at revenue without looking at cost. Was there a profit increase or decrease?
The problem is that it doesn't take into account food costs and how much they spent on that last year vs. this year.
So in the end this still likely cost them money rather than making more money. You can't look at revenue without looking at cost. Was there a profit increase or decrease?
Posted on 1/25/18 at 3:01 pm to bonethug0108
I'm sure the Falcons do not operate the concessions but rather get a percentage of sales which would mean their bottom line increased 16%. I would imagine the companies operating the concessions though are weighing the value of operating a discount concession stand
Posted on 1/25/18 at 3:03 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
They didn't buy 16% more food. It's saying they spent 16% more money than last year.
not even factoring that added cost in adding that much more concessions and beer stands etc than previously all of which adds more labor cost etc. That 50% on prices is a big whack to direct profits.
Posted on 1/25/18 at 3:04 pm to ReneeBVP
quote:
Get a life
Why are you so salty over simple math?
Posted on 1/25/18 at 3:05 pm to BigPerm30
quote:
116 hotdogs
I agree with the idea behind your example, but it was the money spent that makes up the 16%, not the food.
So if fans spent $400 on hotdogs last year (100 hotdogs), they spent $464 this year (~155 hotdogs).
So the food cost would be $200 last year vs. ~$310 this year.
They made $200 last year and only ~$154 this year.
So based on this example, they lost money with the new pricing vs. the old pricing, but without seeing actual food costs for each year we can only assume this holds.
Posted on 1/25/18 at 3:07 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
labor cost etc.
True. Lost sight of labor costs.
And that other guy made a good point in that Blank/the stadium owners likely still made more, but the people running the concessions likely lost a good bit vs. last year.
Posted on 1/25/18 at 3:07 pm to bonethug0108
I understand that my example isn’t perfect which is why I asked for the profit change in my first post. Sales don’t tell the whole story in a business.
Posted on 1/25/18 at 3:13 pm to LakeChuckTiger89
I would have to assume that if they were able to lower their prices it was because they were also able to lower their COGS a considerable amount. ALA the taco bell model. Is it horsemeat? Who knows!
Posted on 1/25/18 at 3:14 pm to LakeChuckTiger89
quote:
The Only Thing Atlanta Got Correct..
Posting a blind link without any context?

Posted on 1/25/18 at 3:25 pm to LakeChuckTiger89
Bunch of arguing about profit margin vs sales in here when we dont have shite for evidence on how much they spent on inventory vs cost of goods sold.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 9:15 am to Ryan3232
Bloomberg has a more in-depth article and 6-minute interview with the vendor's CEO.
Overall profits were down, but were offset in other ways. On average 6,000 more fans came in early, there was no last minute rush through security gates, sales by end of 1st quarter exceeded sales for the whole game the prior year, and merchandise (non-food) sales were up 88%. As evidenced by the dead horse concession rants on the Tiger Rant, a miserable concession experience can lead fans to watch from the couch next time - reason enough to try something new (you know, like listening to fans).
Bloomberg
Overall profits were down, but were offset in other ways. On average 6,000 more fans came in early, there was no last minute rush through security gates, sales by end of 1st quarter exceeded sales for the whole game the prior year, and merchandise (non-food) sales were up 88%. As evidenced by the dead horse concession rants on the Tiger Rant, a miserable concession experience can lead fans to watch from the couch next time - reason enough to try something new (you know, like listening to fans).
Bloomberg
quote:
They also bought more food -- sales were up 53 percent -- and each fan spent, on average, 16 percent more on concessions. It wasn’t enough to offset the drop in prices, though. The team made less on concessions in 2017 than it did the year before, according Steve Cannon, chief executive officer of AMB Group, the company through which Blank owns the team.
“Sure, we could shake out a few more dollars of margin under the old model, but we believe that the direction we’ve taken, given all the other positive benefits, is the bigger revenue play, period,” Cannon said.
Posted on 1/30/18 at 10:15 pm to BigPerm30
I used to go to the Atlanta games and would get a coke at the most! Last time I went to a game, I got a hot dog, nachos, and a coke...and treated my son to the same. The value was the biggest factor.
Popular
Back to top
