- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Parents embezzled money - ethical question
Posted on 1/22/18 at 12:36 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 1/22/18 at 12:36 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Yes. The statute of limitations has run. Also, the charity is estopped from taking the house away because they let you live in it all these years.
your legal analysis leaves something to be desired.
Your criticism of my legal analysis leaves something to be desired, notably as to specificity.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 12:37 pm to texridder
quote:
The clock starts running once crime is discovered on this felony.
Why?
Well for starters, the embezzlement & crime is ongoing.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 12:42 pm to RaginCajunz
quote:
Well for starters, the embezzlement & crime is ongoing.
Weak sauce wedging this in as embezzlement. Let's do theft instead.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 12:46 pm to texridder
quote:
Your criticism of my legal analysis leaves something to be desired, notably as to specificity.
Well, you seemingly have not considered the different ways this could go. First off, the crime could be considered ongoing, so criminal charges could be a consideration. However, you clearly did not consider the implications with the IRS. There is no statute of limitations on civil asset forfeiture for fraudulent returns. The Service would seize the house and the child would be out on the streets.
Did you need more analysis of how your analysis was lacking, or is this sufficient?
Posted on 1/22/18 at 1:03 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Well, you seemingly have not considered the different ways this could go. First off, the crime could be considered ongoing, so criminal charges could be a consideration. However, you clearly did not consider the implications with the IRS. There is no statute of limitations on civil asset forfeiture for fraudulent returns. The Service would seize the house and the child would be out on the streets.
Hard to say the crime is ongoing. Th crime was committed when they came in illegally (I'm bringing the analogy closer to actual rather than hypothetical fact pattern).
I call foul on you for bringing in the IRS angle. They have their own set of rules.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 1:32 pm to RaginCajunz
What about the poor children of Bernie Madoff?
Shouldn't they get to keep a few billion? It wasn't a their fault their daddy broke the law. Why should they be punished?
Shouldn't they get to keep a few billion? It wasn't a their fault their daddy broke the law. Why should they be punished?
Posted on 1/22/18 at 1:38 pm to RaginCajunz
quote:
my parents embezzled a lot of money from a non-profit organization. They took that money and built a very nice house that I grew up in.
I didn't do anything wrong as a child of parents who broke the law? I should be able to keep the house and the money they stole for my education right?
i know who this is, its chelsea clinton
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News