- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you accept the notion of the Big Bang as the origin of our universe?
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:32 pm to McLemore
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:32 pm to McLemore
quote:Just goes to show the power of brainwashing.
I guess if you define "religious people" so narrowly as to exclude brilliant scientists, physicists, philosophers, etc who understand spheres of inquiry--again a straw man tactic--then you have a point. A weak and meaningless one.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:35 pm to Houma Sapien
quote:
Science people: we think we know how the universe formed. Our evidence? Scientific observation
Religious people: we know how the universe formed. Our evidence? A book.
I didn't realized anyone observed the Big Bang.
This post was edited on 1/3/18 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:35 pm to ninthward
quote:
No, because what was there before? Nothing?
Possibly. Spacetime is all one thing. The "space" part of it began at the Big Bang so it’s reasonable to assume the "time" part did also.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:36 pm to Langland
A milisecond after a small one in the Hadron Collider.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:37 pm to DavidTheGnome
But if the two points are on one side and the other, how are they getting further apart if not moving into something that isn’t the universe?
This post was edited on 1/3/18 at 10:38 pm
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:38 pm to baybeefeetz
WHAT THE frick CAME BEFORE THE BIG BANG, HOW DID IT EVEN START? WHERE DID THE MATERIAL COME FROM?
sorry for the caps
sorry for the caps
This post was edited on 1/3/18 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:38 pm to Langland
quote:
I didn't realized anyone observed the Big Bang.
We’ve got a picture of it
Cosmic microwave background
![](https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width/public/thumbnails/image/wmap.png?itok=jDnUAqre)
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is electromagnetic radiation left over from an early stage of the universe in Big Bang cosmology. In older literature, the CMB is also variously known as cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) or "relic radiation". The CMB is a faint cosmic background radiation filling all space that is an important source of data on the early universe because it is the oldest electromagnetic radiation in the universe, dating to the epoch of recombination. With a traditional optical telescope, the space between stars and galaxies (the background) is completely dark. However, a sufficiently sensitive radio telescope shows a faint background noise, or glow, almost isotropic, that is not associated with any star, galaxy, or other object. This glow is strongest in the microwave region of the radio spectrum. The accidental discovery of the CMB in 1964 by American radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson[1][2] was the culmination of work initiated in the 1940s, and earned the discoverers the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics.
This post was edited on 1/3/18 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:38 pm to Rocco4
Pierre part store. They have everything.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:40 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
There isn’t going to be a Big Crunch/Bounce though because our universe is not only expanding outwards, it’s accelerating.
Your own link seems to argue otherwise.
quote:
since the nature of the dark energy that is postulated to drive the acceleration is unknown, it is still possible (though not observationally supported as of today) that it might eventually reverse its developmental path and cause a collapse
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:40 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
If you mean God may have used a big bang to start the universe then yes.
Stay out of this. Intelligent people are talking.
We'll discuss the merits of your magic man when we're done.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:40 pm to Rocco4
Caps don’t bother me.
I think it’s all infinite.
Never began, never will end. Doesn’t have an outside edge.
I think it’s all infinite.
Never began, never will end. Doesn’t have an outside edge.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:40 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
But if the two points are on one side and the other, how are they getting further apart if not moving into something that isn’t the universe?
No one knows what’s outside the observable universe.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:41 pm to iAmBatman
quote:
Until they come up with a better explanation. You got another idea of how it happened?
![](https://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/158/326/9148130.jpg)
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:42 pm to shutterspeed
quote:
Your own link seems to argue otherwise.
Not really. It says it’s possible but not observationally supported.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:42 pm to DavidTheGnome
To me, the stuff on the outside IS STILL the universe.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:42 pm to Houma Sapien
quote:
Science people: we think we know how the universe formed. Our evidence? Scientific observation
Religious people: we know how the universe formed. Our evidence? A book.
![](https://media.giphy.com/media/3R8OhehsI15yU/source.gif)
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:44 pm to Langland
quote:
I didn't realized anyone observed the Big Bang.
quote:
A milisecond after a small one in the Hadron Collider.
![](https://media.giphy.com/media/3R8OhehsI15yU/source.gif)
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:45 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
We’ve got a picture of it
Uh huh.
Yeah, you should look into how that picture was put together.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)