Started By
Message
locked post

Why hasnt Moore filed a libel or slander suit against WaPo?

Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:14 pm
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6960 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:14 pm
Moore says the WaPo article wrongly describes his alleged behavior.

So why hasn't he taken the legal steps to demand a retraction or claim it is negatively affecting him?
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41312 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:15 pm to
Still obsessed with Moore?
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51817 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:15 pm to
Why hasn't Gloria turned over the yearbook?
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Why hasnt Moore filed a libel or slander suit against WaPo?


Everyone knows it's not gonna happen. He's just saying this to convince his zealots that he's innocent.
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:25 pm to
The truth is an absolute defense and Moore knows it.
Posted by mattloc
Alabama
Member since Sep 2012
4320 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:28 pm to
5 day demand for retraction must be served prior to filing suit in Alabama.....
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28937 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:30 pm to
Melt bitch melt.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
49180 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:32 pm to
not even doing it
This post was edited on 11/16/17 at 10:33 pm
Posted by AU_Right
Member since Oct 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:43 pm to
quote:


So why hasn't he taken the legal steps to demand a retraction or claim it is negatively affecting him?

So dipshits like you can go on a message boards and ask stupid questions all because your boy Weird Al's Pic really stole the thunder away from the BS Moore's yearbook pic.
This post was edited on 11/16/17 at 10:44 pm
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 11:06 pm to
Because Moore is considered a "public figure" and his lawyers know the burden of proof is so high it would be a waste of time.

" In the context of defamation actions (libel and slander) as well as invasion of privacy, a public figure cannot base a lawsuit on incorrect harmful statements unless there is proof that the writer or publisher acted with actual malice.

"The plaintiff must produce clear and convincing evidence that the defendant actually knew the information was false or entertained serious doubts as to the truth of his publication. In making this determination, a court will look for evidence of the defendant's state of mind at the time of publication and will likely examine the steps he took in researching, editing, and fact checking his work. It is generally not sufficient, however, for a plaintiff to merely show that the defendant didn't like her, failed to contact her for comment, knew she had denied the information, relied on a single biased source, or failed to correct the statement after publication.
Not surprisingly, this is a very difficult standard for a plaintiff to establish. Indeed, in only a handful of cases over the last decades have plaintiffs been successful in establishing the requisite actual malice to prove defamation."
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 11:07 pm to
Why haven’t the “victims” filed charges against Moore?
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19729 posts
Posted on 11/17/17 at 12:02 am to
Because it’s almost impossible to win a libel lawsuit against a journalist?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram