Started By
Message

re: Players Cavity Back Irons

Posted on 8/16/17 at 4:29 pm to
Posted by The Rodfather
I'm not really sure?
Member since Nov 2008
3941 posts
Posted on 8/16/17 at 4:29 pm to
I hate that Titleist makes two clubs that fall in the same "non-game improvement" category.

The CBs (Cavity Backs) either fall in with the AP2 in the "Players" category or do people consider them to be a "Cavity Blade" and they fall in the "Blade" category with the MBs?

It just makes things a little more confusing. B/c you could argue the AP1s are Super GI, but it is hard to say the AP2s are GI, if anything they fall right between the GI and Players. Now, to add more confusion, they are coming out with a AP3 which will be more GI than the AP1s. So the playability / forgiveness goes something like (Most forgiving to least):

AP3
AP1
AP2
CB
MB
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
18854 posts
Posted on 8/16/17 at 4:36 pm to
don't forget the T-MB. I have no clue what category those are supposed to fall into.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81942 posts
Posted on 8/16/17 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

Now, to add more confusion, they are coming out with a AP3 which will be more GI than the AP1s.
AP3 fits in between 1 and 2,

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram