Can you tell me what part of the video I should skip to? Watched the first 5 minutes trying to have an open mind, but this nonsense is a waste of time.

Please let me know which part of the video I should skip to in order to see this guy explain why the gender pay gap is bullshite. I happen to believe that it largely is, but the first third of this video hardly touches the subject.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by upgrayedd

Lifting at Tobin's house

Member since Mar 2013

135141 posts

Posted on 7/14/17 at 11:37 am to funnystuff

quote:

Can you tell me what part of the video I should skip to? Watched the first 5 minutes trying to have an open mind, but this nonsense is a waste of time.

Yeah, it's hard for me to take this guy seriously when he's ranting like a hyper adhd kid that just drank a gallon of coffee. He's all over the damn place.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by volod

Leesville, LA

Member since Jun 2014

5392 posts

Posted on 7/14/17 at 11:44 am to funnystuff

Prager University 6 minute video

This video gets to the heart of the matter.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by OMLandshark

Member since Apr 2009

109706 posts

Posted on 7/14/17 at 11:49 am to funnystuff

quote:
Can you tell me what part of the video I should skip to? Watched the first 5 minutes trying to have an open mind, but this nonsense is a waste of time.

Here's Sargon's excerpt from it: LINK

And I don't see why PewDiePie hasn't sued the WSJ/News Corp for libel and defamation yet. He could get a dream team of lawyers and not spend a cent himself because all of YouTube would pay for it. It's estimated that the average YouTuber has lost 60% of their income due to the WSJ piece on PewDiePie, which if PewDiePie won would open the floodgates for the WSJ to be sued into an oblivion by YouTube at large.

How fricking awesome would it be if PewDiePie ended up owning the WSJ and News Corp all over a hit piece?