- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Tucker is having a throw down with Ralph Peters
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:17 pm
Waiting for the fists to start flying.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:17 pm to flyAU
quote:
Ralph Peters
this moron trying to say we need to invade half of Earth again?
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:20 pm to CptBengal
quote:
this moron trying to say we need to invade half of Earth again?
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:21 pm to flyAU
Tucker is fricking working this neocon dimwit
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:22 pm to flyAU
Yeah, that was pretty heated. Peters ticked Tucker off!
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:22 pm to CptBengal
quote:
this moron trying to say we need to invade half of Earth again?
He compared Tucker to Charles Lindbergh's "What has Hitler done to us?" schtick.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:23 pm to autauga
That was an entertaining debate.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:23 pm to flyAU
Pretty good viewing. Lt. Peters is insufferable though and another one of these globalists that don't understand what it looks like to actually put American interests first. Totally missed the Trump movement.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:25 pm to flyAU
"But if I had to do it over again, no, I would not get rid of Saddam Hussein." ~ Lt Col Peters.
Suck a big one you pin-headed war hawk.
Suck a big one you pin-headed war hawk.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:26 pm to flyAU
I caught the ast 10 seconds. Damn!
I like Peters, but he does want to fight everyone on the world stage.
I like Peters, but he does want to fight everyone on the world stage.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:28 pm to flyAU
Tucker was missing on the main point. What he was trying to convey is that here are certain places in the world that we the UNITED STATES are better off when ruled by secular dictators. Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Syria etc.
I wished he would have just come out and said that.
Also, he should have added that it's unfortunate that yes these secular dictators sometimes kill their own, but there is nothing you can do. The oppressed people in those countries missed the genetic lottery and were born into their situation. They should blame their parents for bringing them into the world under such circumstances. But this is not the US's problem.
I wished he would have just come out and said that.
Also, he should have added that it's unfortunate that yes these secular dictators sometimes kill their own, but there is nothing you can do. The oppressed people in those countries missed the genetic lottery and were born into their situation. They should blame their parents for bringing them into the world under such circumstances. But this is not the US's problem.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:32 pm to flyAU
quote:
Waiting for the fists to start flying.
I thoroughly enjoyed that.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:40 pm to Covingtontiger77
He did say that though...
Posted on 7/11/17 at 7:49 pm to RantardoMontalbon
"But if I had to do it over again, no, I would not get rid of Saddam Hussein." ~ Lt Col Peters.
Suck a big one you pin-headed war hawk.
His view on the Role of the United States military.
Peters' 1997 article "Constant Conflict"[8][9] stated: "There will be no peace. At any given moment for the rest of our lifetimes, there will be multiple conflicts in mutating forms around the globe. Violent conflict will dominate the headlines, but cultural and economic struggles will be steadier and ultimately more decisive. The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing."
Suck a big one you pin-headed war hawk.
His view on the Role of the United States military.
Peters' 1997 article "Constant Conflict"[8][9] stated: "There will be no peace. At any given moment for the rest of our lifetimes, there will be multiple conflicts in mutating forms around the globe. Violent conflict will dominate the headlines, but cultural and economic struggles will be steadier and ultimately more decisive. The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing."
Posted on 7/11/17 at 8:07 pm to Themole
quote:
Peters' 1997 article "Constant Conflict"[8][9] stated: "There will be no peace. At any given moment for the rest of our lifetimes, there will be multiple conflicts in mutating forms around the globe. Violent conflict will dominate the headlines, but cultural and economic struggles will be steadier and ultimately more decisive. The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing."
Absolutely frightening, MIC anybody?
Posted on 7/12/17 at 9:24 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
Absolutely frightening, MIC anybody?
MIC ?
Posted on 7/12/17 at 9:29 am to Themole
Military industrial complex
Posted on 7/12/17 at 9:51 am to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
Military industrial complex
Of course. I suffer from acronym burnout.
Thanks
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News