Started By
Message

re: Why is it Okay to Talk About Trump/Russia w/No Evidence, but Seth Rich is not ok?

Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:41 am to
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:41 am to
quote:

I don't know. Why would he lie about something he has absolutely no stake in?


No way, you can't possibly believe this
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35243 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:42 am to
quote:

At the behest of the Democratic leadership. Let's be honest here. They are driving this witch hunt.
Or maybe there is a legitimate and justifiable investigation, not into Trump himself, but his much shadier associates.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69947 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:43 am to
Cahoots and Salmon are also mad, on the internet

Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140989 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:43 am to
quote:

our intelligence agencies. It's hard to wrap your head around that.


Yeah and it's hard to wrap your head around leaks coming from those agencies for political reasons.

Strange times.
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
40632 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:43 am to
Especially when the only reason there is no evidence in the Seth Rich assassination is because they've been covering it up.
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
5906 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:44 am to
if it was Rich he should and would publish his source being that source is dead. and he hasn't yet so to me that answers that question.
Posted by VOLhalla
Knoxville
Member since Feb 2011
4467 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:44 am to
What do you mean there's no evidence of Trump/Russia? The Russian government committed felonies to try to get Trump elected

Multiple members of the Trump administration have lied about conversations with Russian diplomats. Multiple members of the Trump administration have financial ties to Russia. Trump may have tried to impede an investigation into connections between Trump's campaign and Russia. Any member of the public who says that they know that Trump and Russia colluded is full of shite right now because there's no public proof. But there are three seperate investigations right now. We will see if anything comes up.

There's absolutely nothing to the tragic murder of Seth Rich that would tie it to the DNC or Clinton. It doesn't even follow logically. You think a professional assassin would've left him alive on the streets of D.C.? If Rich had been in contact with Wikileaks you don't think Assange would be tripping over himself to show proof? It's ludicrous.

Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:44 am to
quote:

This board trusts Julian Assange, Kim Dot Com, and Hannity over our intelligence agencies. It's hard to wrap your head around that.


How many of you were distrustful of the IC after the Snowden story? It's interesting how you trust the IC when you are hoping for a specific outcome.
Posted by AuburnTigers
Member since Aug 2013
7114 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:45 am to
One there is proof of a crime.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:46 am to
Well you see the media all of a sudden has developed a conscience and doesn't want to hurt anyone's feelings, or it could be because they're fricking hacks and are worried about the DNC's image taking another hit. I'm sure it's the former not the latter. We all know how much compassion the left has.
Posted by Haydo
DTX
Member since Jul 2011
2949 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:46 am to
quote:

You have the heads of our intelligence confirming to evidence of collusion


You need to put down the fake news.

As our president would say: Wrong.

No one, intelligence community or politician (republican and democrat alike), has stated there's any single thread of evidence connecting the Trump campaign to collusion with Russia. They have use the word "smoke" many times. That's it.

Dianne Feinstein (Dem on Intelligence Committee) confirms no evidence. Skip to 1:30 mark.
LINK

James Clapper has also confirmed no evidence
LINK
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 9:53 am
Posted by UHTiger
Member since Jan 2007
5231 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:10 am to
Because sent it as much as you like there is evidence Russia tampered with our election.

There is also evidence people close to trump were involved with Russia and were lying about it

This should be fully investigated not necessarily to implicate trump but to see who was there involved and how.


There is ZERO evidence - not a single shred - supporting this stupid Seth rich fantasy

Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:28 am to
Yeah, I don't think the Trump/Russia thing is definite. However, Flynn did something wrong and he was very tight with Trump.

The Seth Rich story is pure speculation. The only sources are crazy people on the internet.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21980 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:32 am to
quote:

You have the heads of our intelligence confirming to evidence of collusion and it still doesn't matter to those idiots.



Link?
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17506 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Why is it Okay to Talk About Trump/Russia w/No Evidence, but Seth Rich is not ok?


No bullet,
No blood,
No body...

Russians!

Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:38 am to
quote:

This type of censorship & suppression has hit an all-time high (low). Some may not care, given the matter being suppressed this time, but next time it could be different.



So, you're saying those leftist libtards at Fox News are "suppressing" a valid news story?

The only thing being "suppressed" here is Sean Hannity completely making shite up out of thin air and feeding it to the monkeys as real news. Apparently, even Fox News has some principles and would like to keep whatever tiny crumbs of credibility it has.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:38 am to
He has a ton of reason to lie. "Blame the dead guy" is a pretty classic strategy. This helps protect any current sources he has.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Especially when the only reason there is no evidence in the Seth Rich assassination is because they've been covering it up.


Yeah, I've just never heard groups like the media & DNC say you shouldn't discuss a matter because it might hurt the feelings of one American family. That's a new one on me. Seems Like a dangerous precedent to me, and also denotes the sad current state of our media.

And yes, it certainly suggests that there's something there which needs to be covered up.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35243 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Yeah, I've just never heard groups like the media & DNC say you shouldn't discuss a matter because it might hurt the feelings of one American family
Well when that happens, be sure to let us know.
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 10:41 am
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17069 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:41 am to
quote:

This board trusts Julian Assange, Kim Dot Com, and Hannity over our intelligence agencies. It's hard to wrap your head around that.


I don't trust any of them. Assange and Kim Dotcom have their own motives. And Obama's intelligence community has its own motives (and directives from above).

Brennan and Clapper are far left Democrats. Comey is good buddies with the Clintons. I don't trust any of them when it comes to a contentious issue like Donald Trump winning an election over their beloved Hillary. The CIA are trained liars and professionals at espionage and deception.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram