re: Did Russia hack HRC and the DNC,

I know you're emotionally invested in this "DNC hid its server from the FBI" nonsense, but you're coming across as a fool. Large organizations simply don't hand over their entire server history to the FBI. I, and every attorney I've worked with, would vehemently recommend against it.

quote:

---

How, in what way, is it a liability risk? It is the FBI - not some rouge company. They shouldn't have anything to hide.

---

Because no organization the size of the DNC knows with absolute certainly what its employees are emailing about. What if an employee sent an email admitting to dealing drugs on company property? Or if the company driver who was involved in a fender bender admitted that he was still drunk from the night before? There are a million things employees could admit in emails that could open the company up to liability. Why take that risk when you can hire a third party to single out only the relevant information for the FBI?

Ah, well their liability was mitigated and they lost the election. Even if the Russians phished those morons' email when they had horrible internal controls, it has no bearing on any allegations concerning the election being "hacked," or the manner in which the results were tabulated across the country.

They didn't do the dnc unless Seth rich is russian

Funny how the vileness in those emails is not disputed but totally forgotten

The dems do shite way worse than anything they accuse trump of as sop

quote:

---

quote:
Name all 17 agencies that stated that please....all of them.
=============

USA intelligence community:

Air Force Intelligence
Army Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
Coast Guard Intelligence
Defense Intelligence Agency
Energy Department
Homeland Security Department
State Department
Treasury Department
Drug Enforcement Administration
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Marine Corps Intelligence
National Geospatial Intelligence Agency
National Reconnaissance Office
National Security Agency
Navy Intelligence
Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

The person in charge of all the intelligence portions of all 17 departments came to the conclusion that Russia was behind the hacks

---

Serious question here:

I keep hearing about the '17 agencies concluded . . ."

My question = did all these agencies do their own analysis or any sort of investigation?

Or did they just all review the same piece of data that said 'looks like Russians' and agreed that 'yep it does.'

It seems to me they all worked with one conclusion formed by a third party and didn't look any further.

SO - they caught the Russians doing the same thing they have been doing for 50 years and what all countries do all the time.

No big deal to me.

Now = if somehow they had actually interfered with what the DNC and HRC were doing and inserted fictitious data into their communications streams or redirected/misdirected their communications then perhaps there would be a case of 'interference.'

But it appears to me they merely reported what they found due to lax security procedures by the DNC and HRC. It's almost like if they had found a briefcase on the sidewalk containing DNC/HRC communications and instead of destroying it passed it on.

This 'interference' narrative always seems to morph into a "hacked the election" narrative and that is worse than anything the Russkies ever did.

quote:

---

My question = did all these agencies do their own analysis or any sort of investigation?

---

No. This has been debunked. James Clapper said at his public hearing that only 3 agencies did the research (FBI, CIA, NSA). It's retarded to think that the Energy Department or Treasury Department had anything to do with this.

He also said that the analysts who wrote the report were "hand picked." (That means picked by the very trustworthy Obama/Lynch/Rice combo).