Started By
Message

re: Russia did not hack the DNC. The FBI did not investigate it. The company lied.

Posted on 5/12/17 at 2:28 pm to
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/12/17 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

No one disputes the fact that the Russians were willing and capable. Just pointing out that no evidence has been released or leaked beyond the Crowdstrike assessment. It may well have been the Russians but it is far from proven.
So why has the IC recently strengthened its confidence level following crowdstrike's revisions of some of its findings? What does "no evidence" mean? That it didn't come from Trump or Assange's lips so you don't believe it?
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 5/12/17 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

So why has the IC recently strengthened its confidence level following crowdstrike's revisions of some of its findings?


So CrowdStrike lowered from "medium confidence" to "low confidence"

and the IC increased theres?

Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22650 posts
Posted on 5/12/17 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

What does "no evidence" mean?



It means no evidence released or leaked aside from the Crowdstrike assessment. Even with the amount of leaking of irrelevant bullshite you seriously believe that they have real evidence and are holding it tight?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram