Started By
Message

re: Whitlock: How a Gawker-Affiliated Website Made ESPN Politically Correct

Posted on 5/8/17 at 11:30 am to
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25912 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 11:30 am to
I think the cord cutting thing is hurting them, but i think ratings are hurting them more, especially for live sporting events. And are these cord cutter numbers reflecting those that left cable, but still have ESPN through, Sling/Vue/DTVnow and now Hulu? I'm a cord cutter i guess, but i still pay for ESPN through Sling.

Monday Night Football was down a lot last year. Airing a football game where you expect to make millions on advertisements, and then have to give money back to the advertisers b/c the ratings were down play a very large part. Those huge contracts they gave the NFL and NBA are advertising driven. Their sportscenter and daytime crap has little to do with the money they through at those two leagues.
That's a simple fix. Quit starting the fricking games at 8 central time. 75% of the country lives in teh eastern and central time zone. We are all sleeping by halftime. Also, no one wants to watch the Bills and Texans play. So what if you piss off some guy from Florida or North Carolina or whereever, the Cowboys, rest of the NFC East, Packers, Seahawks, Patriots and any other hot topic team should be the teams playing on Monday night more often than not.

MLB ratings have always been somewhat low on ESPN.
The recent NBA ratings took their hit b/c of star players deciding not to play. Last year those saturday night games were great. This year they were terrible.


Biggest thing is they need to adapt and offer a streaming fee for WatchESPN and all of it's content. That can't be that difficult or expensive to do. By not doing it, you get zero dollars from it. Even if you just get it from some folks for college football season, is that not worth it? I'd drop sling and pay for it all year, simply b/c i watch LSU football, basketball and baseball.

Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40871 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 12:26 pm to
Ratings is something that should worry them more than cord cutting.

How many of you actually watch the pregame NBA and NFL shows? Stuff is so regurgitated and broken down during the week in between games that nothing is really ground breaking or fresh come gameday. Unless something emergent happens. For instance, I don't watch any of the SEC on CBS, NBA Primetime, or NFL Countdown. Or Fox shows for that matter. I just put the game on once it starts. I would imagine a lot of people do the same.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40871 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

And are these cord cutter numbers reflecting those that left cable, but still have ESPN through, Sling/Vue/DTVnow and now Hulu? I'm a cord cutter i guess, but i still pay for ESPN through Sling.


You haven't cut the cord if you are getting the same channels through a different service streaming or otherwise.

Cutting the cord is cutting the cord. Not paying for channels period.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59157 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Also, no one wants to watch the Bills and Texans play. So what if you piss off some guy from Florida or North Carolina or whereever, the Cowboys, rest of the NFC East, Packers, Seahawks, Patriots and any other hot topic team should be the teams playing on Monday night more often than not.


Those are the games on NBC Sunday night now. What ESPN has as MNF is the old Sunday package, which was originally the cable package.

Their biggest revenue source is the monthly cable fee and something like 70% of cable subs do not watch ESPN to begin with.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram