- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Former intel officer confirms to CNN that US IC was using Brits to get around US law
Posted on 4/15/17 at 11:41 am to ShortyRob
Posted on 4/15/17 at 11:41 am to ShortyRob
quote:Well you misread that post entirely. You started whining about how I received derision from you for giving you shite or something. I mentioned that I didn't realize people took umbrage when they received assholish responses to their own assholish behavior, and sardonically qualified that I always assumed it was because of political disagreement.
Hey. You brought up people being ganged up on; I didn't.
But I don't lament the old give-and-take; I like it (in case you didn't notice).
quote:That's some heavy stuff, Shorty. You should be on the lecture circuit.
It's a political board. Opinions are kind of the thing in here. Glad I could help clear up something else for ya.
0
Posted on 4/15/17 at 11:44 am to Errerrerrwere
Keep melting man. You are the reason why we play the game. Seeing that facade fade away into the nasty woman you are is priceless.
Posted on 4/15/17 at 11:46 am to ShortyRob
My statement was "we push back to keep it fun"
I am good.
I am good.
Posted on 4/15/17 at 11:52 am to TJGator1215
quote:
Just like Benghazi another Republican CT witch hunt.
You mean the same Benghazi investigation that found actual criminal wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton?
If Hillary was practically ANY other American she would be in Federal Lockup.
That is a fact!
Posted on 4/15/17 at 12:00 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
indication is that the higher-ups in the Obama Administration wanted nothing to do with this
Hey Sport, how come Obama didn't notify A PRIVATE US citizen that he had knowledge that the citizen was under surveillance by a foreign govt?
Why did they read the transcripts, AND THEN, pass them around, if they wanted nothing to do with it?
Posted on 4/15/17 at 12:03 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
The man was being groomed by KGB agents since the 1980s
By never having him run for public office? You're a lunatic!
Posted on 4/15/17 at 12:10 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
This is an FBI investigation...
As was Hillarys emails
And Anthony Weiners sexting
And Lois Lerner
JBE's brother the sheriff
The FBI have anything in those cases? They sure do like to investigate. Too dumb to find anything, doe
Posted on 4/15/17 at 12:13 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
For frick's sake. The man (ie: Trump) was being groomed by KGB agents since the 1980s
Wow, I used to think you were somewhat intelligent. Now I realize you are just off your fricking rocker.
On second thought, I cannot believe that the USA has elected TWO MANCHURIAN CANDIDATES, back-to-back.
Barry and Drumpf......... Whe have been Catfished.
Posted on 4/15/17 at 12:15 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
That was at the point where some of you hardheaded jokers wouldn't even concede that Russia had tried to interfere in the election. I threw out the (accurate) point that "yes they did, and it isn't the first time."
We now have more evidence that Brit intel tried to influence the election for Hillary, way more than we have on any Russian influence. Where's the faux outrage on that?
Posted on 4/15/17 at 12:20 pm to League Champs
quote:No, we don't. We have evidence that the UK, our strongest ally, was concerned about contacts between prominent Americans and various persons with ties to the Kremlin--our most pressing adversary.
We now have more evidence that Brit intel tried to influence the election for Hillary, way more than we have on any Russian influence.
Maybe you see some equivalence between the Russian Federation and the UK that you can explain to me.
quote:No outrage. Just a concerned American.
Where's the faux outrage on that?
Posted on 4/15/17 at 12:29 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
was concerned about contacts between prominent Americans and various persons with ties to the Kremlin
Zero evidence
Name one person that was even with Trump in May 2015? If you can't, then you have zero evidence
And all we know from Carter was he met spies at an energy conference, and gave them a business card. Which is what one does at a conference
Posted on 4/15/17 at 12:48 pm to League Champs
quote:
Name one person that was even with Trump in May 2015? If you can't, then you have zero evidence
The UK, and our other friends and allies, routinely collect on agents of the Russian Federation. Intercepts that interested them in 2015 would not need to specifically involve formal members of the Trump campaign. They could include Trump associates or possible campaign surrogates, or business and other connections within the Russian Federation. And let me reiterate that these incidental intercepts we keep referring to would likely be inclusive of conversations that simply referred or alluded to Trump, his businesses, his campaign, his associates etc. They needn't all have someone closely affiliated with the campaign on one end of the call. They could be transcripts of two Russians discussing some development of interest.
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:02 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
For frick's sake. The man was being groomed by KGB agents since the 1980s ( LINK):
Damn Doc, Paige really did a number on your psyche. This is next level lunacy.
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:08 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
The UK, and our other friends and allies, routinely collect on agents of the Russian Federation. Intercepts that interested them in 2015 would not need to specifically involve formal members of the Trump campaign.
Once again, there is no evidence of that. In fact, we have the complete opposite. GCHQ has said it is "utterly ridiculous" to suspect they conducted any surveillance of Trump or his team!
????
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:10 pm to League Champs
quote:No they did not. Quit making things up.
GCHQ has said it is "utterly ridiculous" to suspect they conducted any surveillance of Trump or his team!
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:19 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
No they did not. Quit making things up.
quote:
“Recent allegations made by media commentator judge Andrew Napolitano about GCHQ being asked to conduct ‘wiretapping’ against the then president-elect are nonsense. They are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored.”
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:42 pm to League Champs
quote:
being asked
Words matter Whistles.. Bing
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:47 pm to Navytiger74
You're just digging, dude. Give up.
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:53 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Words matter
Yes, they do. The Brits fed the US intel on Trump for almost 2 years (May '15 to Jan '17), and not one time was asked to stop spying on American citizens? Not once
So silence, matters a lot too
Yet, GCHQ said it was utterly ridiculous to think they were providing surveillance to Obama. They lied. So why would you believe them when they said they "weren't asked"?
cha ching...bada bing
Posted on 4/15/17 at 2:54 pm to League Champs
quote:They did not.
Once again, there is no evidence of that. In fact, we have the complete opposite. GCHQ has said it is "utterly ridiculous" to suspect they conducted any surveillance of Trump or his team!
They were monitoring some guys with connections to Moscow in the conduct of their routine activities. Not really their fault that some in "Trump's team" were so keen on playing beer pong with that particular crowd, is it?
Trying to be relatable just there since the whole "incidental collection" thing seems to be a hard concept for some.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News