- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I would just like to say that I predicted the liberal reaction
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:17 pm
I've been saying from the word go that liberals who were denying the Trump surveillance didn't actually care and in fact supported it if it happened. This is exactly like every other situation like this. They pretend it would be a bad thing but it isn't true. Then when it turns out to be true they defend it. And let's be honest. Liberals are completely okay with using the government to Target their opponents. They would be pissed if their leaders didn't do it
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:20 pm to RobbBobb
quote:up voted
braggart
Go take a nap
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:21 pm to ShortyRob
I think you assessed this situation perfectly
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:24 pm to ShortyRob
CIA can't be trusted and needs complete overhaul of top leadership.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:26 pm to ShortyRob
DOJ should immediately investigate the misuse of the collected data...if it ever is properly done, prison space will tighten...Loretta ain't petite.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:27 pm to ShortyRob
You missed the fact that it wasn't a "trump surveillance". His people were talking to people under FISA which is the
physical and electronic surveillance and collection of "foreign intelligence information" between "foreign powers" and "agents of foreign powers" ... Why were members of Trump's team talking to foreign powers or agents of foreign powers that were under surveillance? You guys are glossing over the facts for a Palin "gotcha" moment.
physical and electronic surveillance and collection of "foreign intelligence information" between "foreign powers" and "agents of foreign powers" ... Why were members of Trump's team talking to foreign powers or agents of foreign powers that were under surveillance? You guys are glossing over the facts for a Palin "gotcha" moment.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:30 pm to ShortyRob
Right, they had no problem with Obama using the IRS to target the Tea Party.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:32 pm to ShortyRob
Did Obama tap Pussy Grabber's phones or not? A simple yes or no will suffice.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:33 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:after months of pretending they would oppose it if it were true. Then when it came out as true they rationalize that it was okay because well those were bad people
they had no problem with Obama using the IRS to target the Tea Party
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:33 pm to YNWA
quote:Unmasking
missed the fact that it wasn't a "trump surveillance". His people were talking to people under FISA which is the
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:34 pm to ShortyRob
So the Nunes said that according to a source, perfectly legal, incidental collection of some members of the Trump team may have happened. And then went on to explicitly deny that Trump tower/Trump was tapped. And we're supposed to pretend this is new? That is hasn't been out in the public sphere for months? Because you guys are in a tizzy.
We literally discussed this shite on here. At length.
And if RobbRobb (not you, from another thread) weren't too old to google "Navytiger74 surveillance or wiretap" he could have seen our points and more.
Nunes was able to provide some breathing room without lying because people are so easily led to what they're told.
Here are a couple of good articles about what you actually think you saw (but didn't) today.
LINK
LINK
We literally discussed this shite on here. At length.
And if RobbRobb (not you, from another thread) weren't too old to google "Navytiger74 surveillance or wiretap" he could have seen our points and more.
Nunes was able to provide some breathing room without lying because people are so easily led to what they're told.
Here are a couple of good articles about what you actually think you saw (but didn't) today.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:34 pm to Toddy
quote:I give you exhibit a of what a lying piece of shite horrible fricking person liberal looks like. I'm sorry if I understated how shitty you are toddy
bama tap Pussy Grabber's phones or not? A simple yes or no will suffice
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 6:35 pm
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:35 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I give you exhibit a of what a lying piece of shite horrible fricking person liberal looks like.
Dude...
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:36 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:I'm sorry. Some people just aren't worth the time. Toddy is world-class piece of shite. There is no fricking way he's not an awful person in real life
Dude
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:37 pm to ShortyRob
Is there something else in particular? Not sure how you reached that conclusion from his post.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:38 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:cumulative effect
Is there something else in particular? Not sure how you reached that conclusion from his post.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:39 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
give you exhibit a of what a lying piece of shite horrible fricking person liberal looks like. I'm sorry if I understated how shitty you are toddy
Wow. Drama queen. What the frick have I done to you?
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:39 pm to ShortyRob
quote:You should read the posts of some of the people you like.
I'm sorry. Some people just aren't worth the time. Toddy is world-class piece of shite. There is no fricking way he's not an awful person in real life
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:39 pm to ShortyRob
Gotcha.
You're mad AF today.
You're mad AF today.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News