Started By
Message

Butler or Sherman?

Posted on 3/16/17 at 7:46 pm
Posted by Breauxseph
Lafourche
Member since Jan 2017
4 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 7:46 pm
Former Patriots executive Michael Lombardi mentioned on The Ringer podcast “The NFL Show” that the Seahawks would be open to trading CB Richard Sherman for the right deal.

“I truly believe based on what I hear around the National Football League that the Seahawks would in fact for the right deal trade Richard Sherman,” Lombardi said.

Lombardi makes the case that the Saints, who have met with Patriots restricted free agent Malcolm Butler, would be better off pursuing a trade for Sherman, who would actually fit the kind of defense they want to play.

A big consideration for New Orleans brought up by Lombardi is that signing Butler would require a long-term deal that comes with an annual salary of $13-14 million and cost the Saints a draft pick when they could draft a young cornerback to develop or consider a trade for Sherman.

This is based on what Lombardi’s hearing, so it’s hard to say just how willing Seattle would actually be to trade their top cornerback. In the past, Seattle hasn’t shied away from making notable trades, but they’re usually the ones acquiring the notable player such as the Jimmy Graham and Percy Harvin deals.
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25291 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 7:47 pm to
literally right below your post.

FNG
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
21349 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 7:52 pm to
Graham.
Posted by bountyhunter
North of Houston a bit
Member since Mar 2012
6357 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 7:54 pm to
I don't think they are interested in that diva.
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
10788 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 9:02 pm to
32 for butler
2nd for Sherman

Use 11th for CB
Posted by breauxmosexual
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2016
2526 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 9:03 pm to
Let's take them both and have breaux play nickel


oh...what up breauxseph
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24778 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 10:03 pm to
Both too expensive
Posted by hsfolk
Member since Sep 2009
18598 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 11:07 pm to
neither
Posted by breauxmosexual
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2016
2526 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 2:43 am to
I don't understand why anyone would downvote this. Lets be honest if you have to choose between Butler and Sherman, you choose Sherman. This gives us leverage and you can bet they are rushing to get the deal with us done now. Sherman is still 28 he's got 2-3 solid years left and guy is elite as it gets
Posted by MirrOlure
The Bayou
Member since Jul 2010
725 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 3:16 am to
NO Sherman !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I would cancel my Tickets !!
Posted by bayouboy318
Natchitoches, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2016
377 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 10:21 pm to
At this point, I'll take either one because we have neither.
Posted by MirrOlure
The Bayou
Member since Jul 2010
725 posts
Posted on 3/18/17 at 12:52 am to
Richard Sherman's mouth over rides his Play , No Thanks!!
Posted by eddieray
Lafayette
Member since Mar 2006
18030 posts
Posted on 3/18/17 at 7:32 pm to
Butler
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:38 am to
Much as I think Butler is overrated...Sherman would get torched if he was a Saint. He needs S help for him to play aggressive like he does and we don't have that here. He has 2 excellent S behind him. Who would he have here?

We would be posting burnt toast gifs every game with Sherman here. I have no doubt about that. He's a great player but he just does not fit us, sorry.
This post was edited on 3/19/17 at 10:40 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram