- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: True or False: climate change
Posted on 3/13/17 at 10:46 pm to bmy
Posted on 3/13/17 at 10:46 pm to bmy
It's patently false, atmospheric water vapor & CO2 levels have a direct correlation with temperature.
By continuing to pump CO2 into the atmosphere, and methane from cow emissions, eventually a point of no return will be reached, where the Earth's retention of solar radiation will overwhelm its ability to dispel heat, and a Venus-like runaway greenhouse inferno will materialize
By continuing to pump CO2 into the atmosphere, and methane from cow emissions, eventually a point of no return will be reached, where the Earth's retention of solar radiation will overwhelm its ability to dispel heat, and a Venus-like runaway greenhouse inferno will materialize
2
Posted on 3/14/17 at 8:05 am to tarzana
quote:
By continuing to pump CO2 into the atmosphere, and methane from cow emissions, eventually a point of no return will be reached, where the Earth's retention of solar radiation will overwhelm its ability to dispel heat, and a Venus-like runaway greenhouse inferno will materialize
Yeah, that's not true
1) explain how we've pumped more CO2 into the atmosphere, and yet temps have leveled off, and in some years decreased?
2) Why have scientists adopted the theory of oceans as temperature sinks that can hold in this added warmth?
3) How in the HELL is it possible that receding lakes and glaciers are uncovering previous civilizations, if man has continued to produce C02 since their evolution? How did the Earth ever cool enough to cover their previous industrial activities?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 9:35 am to tarzana
quote:This would be true if everything was 1:1 and linear like iosh's chart. But it's not reality. CO2 radiative forcing isn't linear. Radiative heat losses aren't linear. Temperature and water vapor are both non linear and have huge discrete discontinuities.
By continuing to pump CO2 into the atmosphere, and methane from cow emissions, eventually a point of no return will be reached, where the Earth's retention of solar radiation will overwhelm its ability to dispel heat, and a Venus-like runaway greenhouse inferno will materialize
This post was edited on 3/14/17 at 9:36 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News