- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump refuses to give the source for his "wiretapping" charge?
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:55 pm
Just curious. I think it is bizarre. Why is he doing that?
And then Trump ratcheted up the focus on his charge by saying he wants the "wiretapping" investigated in conjunction with the other election issues.
So, why would he do that?
And then Trump ratcheted up the focus on his charge by saying he wants the "wiretapping" investigated in conjunction with the other election issues.
So, why would he do that?
27
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:56 pm to Bullethead88
When did he refuse?
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:57 pm to Bullethead88
He's The President he can find out anything he wants. He says Obama bugged him then we have to believe him or else you're calling Our President a liar.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:58 pm to Bullethead88
Going after the deep state. Wake up you little drone.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 6:59 pm to Bullethead88
He is calling for an investigation and instructed spicer to withhold comments for that reason.
It isn't hard.
It isn't hard.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 7:04 pm to Bullethead88
Trump: criticizes the use of anonymous sources. Calls it fake news.
Also Trump: uses anonymous source.
Also Trump: uses anonymous source.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 7:08 pm to Bullethead88
There's no need to be in a hurry to release evidence, only a-hole are melting about that. He could release evidence in a month and still be 3 months ahead of the bitches claiming Russian collusion
Posted on 3/6/17 at 7:11 pm to Bullethead88
Trump is a sensationalist, he throws shite against the wall to see what sticks, so sad that this clown is our "president".
Posted on 3/6/17 at 7:11 pm to Bullethead88
It's part of an ongoing investigation 
Posted on 3/6/17 at 7:12 pm to Bullethead88
As Jay Carney and Josh Ernest use to say - "since the subject being discussed is currently under investigation, we can't comment. Next question."
Posted on 3/6/17 at 7:15 pm to Bullethead88
Now the people pushing the Russian BS have a problem in tht they want to investigate their story that has no evidence but then dismiss this because of "no evidence" even though the evidence was all over the MSM a few weeks back.
In fact, the writer of the above the fold "wire tapping" story in the NYT on election day came out yesterday or today saying there "is no evidence of wiretapping". It's like libs really don't think anybody is capable of checking what they say.
In fact, the writer of the above the fold "wire tapping" story in the NYT on election day came out yesterday or today saying there "is no evidence of wiretapping". It's like libs really don't think anybody is capable of checking what they say.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 7:19 pm to Bullethead88
Because it's Breitbart and/or Mark Levin.
Talk about loony-tunes.
Talk about loony-tunes.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 7:20 pm to Bullethead88
quote:Really?
Just curious. I think it is bizarre.
The media does it every day
Posted on 3/6/17 at 7:27 pm to Bullethead88
quote:Because (1) legit conformational inquiries to the FBI have been met with asinine accusations of Executive Branch interference, and (2) because he wants to exempt the EB from further accusations of """bias""" against EB opponents.
Why is he doing that?
Posted on 3/6/17 at 7:35 pm to Bullethead88
I imagine hes protecting someones life (see Seth Rich)
Posted on 3/6/17 at 8:05 pm to Bullethead88
quote:
Why is he doing that?
https://youtu.be/pf7vjAhiYHk
If it was time to reveal his source he would do it. Obviously this isn't the time because arrests would be made if it was. In that case, you don't give a source because the source would be killed and then you couldn't use the source in court.
Trump could be lying, but it is probably he doesn't want his source killed. If you followed the election you would have seen people being killed off for revealing information about the Clintons.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 8:29 pm to Bullethead88
Mark Levin and Brietbart
Posted on 3/6/17 at 9:22 pm to Bullethead88
Trump's source is Breitbart.
We all know this, its not like its the first time. Trump sees something on O'Reilly or Breitbart and then tweets about it, there's no malevolence or planning, hell I don't even know if you can consider it a lie he probably the nks that its the truth at the time. because it reinforces his pre-existing world view.
We all know this, its not like its the first time. Trump sees something on O'Reilly or Breitbart and then tweets about it, there's no malevolence or planning, hell I don't even know if you can consider it a lie he probably the nks that its the truth at the time. because it reinforces his pre-existing world view.
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 3:21 am
Posted on 3/6/17 at 10:43 pm to Bullethead88
quote:
Just curious. I think it is bizarre.
its handy
takes pressure off the revelations thet Trump was involved in a Iranian scam in Baku.
Trump and/or his family are going to do time. Which ones will be taking the fall?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 2:38 am to Bullethead88
Probably going to tell us in the same presser he discusses his release of his tax returns.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News