- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Protectionism is not the answer
Posted on 2/24/17 at 10:01 am to I B Freeman
Posted on 2/24/17 at 10:01 am to I B Freeman
quote:Of course it's not the answer.
Protectionism is not the answer
But Trump is a master negotiator and threatening protectionism is a genius tactic to begin negotiations for new truly 'free' trade agreements.
Posted on 2/24/17 at 10:03 am to LSURussian
quote:
Trump is a master negotiator
is it the multiple bankruptcies that is the evidence for this or do you have something else?
Posted on 2/24/17 at 10:09 am to LSURussian
quote:
But Trump is a master negotiator and threatening protectionism is a genius tactic to begin negotiations for new truly 'free' trade agreements.
This is the same political support base that triumph in every delivered campaign promise. What makes you think he won't deliver on this as well? Maybe he's fricking serious just like he was with the boondoggle of a border wall.
I think this is just wishful thinking.
Posted on 2/24/17 at 10:13 am to LSURussian
quote:
Of course it's not the answer.
But Trump is a master negotiator and threatening protectionism is a genius tactic to begin negotiations for new truly 'free' trade agreements.
I don't hear him advocating truly "free" trade but I wish he would.
I agree that NAFTA is far from free trade and should be dismantle and reconstructed. That does not necessitate an overall border tax.
The idea that we need a border tax embedded in the tax code for all imports is insanity. Ryan wants to force companies that import to reduce their cost of goods sold by the amount they import causing them to have much larger taxable profits---that is really insane.
quote:
How would the border adjustment work? It would alter the current corporate tax structure by essentially imposing a tax or levy of 20 percent on all imports – including components and parts used in assembly – while exempting U.S. exporters from any taxes. Viewed another way, U.S. companies would no longer have to report revenue generated by their overseas sales as taxable income, but for the same token, they could no longer claim expenses incurred by importing goods and materials as deductible from their federal tax obligation.
“This would shift the current corporate income tax from an origin-based tax—one that applies to the production of goods and services in the United States—to a destination-based tax—one that applies to the consumption of goods and services in the United State,” according to a Tax Foundation analysis.
Trump supports the Ryan plan. It is ludicrous.
Thankfully the republicans in the senate seem to be very much opposed to it.
This post was edited on 2/24/17 at 10:26 am
Posted on 2/24/17 at 11:41 am to LSURussian
quote:
quote:Protectionism is not the answerOf course it's not the answer. But Trump is a master negotiator and threatening protectionism is a genius tactic to begin negotiations for new truly 'free' trade agreements.
This and when trade is not balanced, measures might be necessary to balance the situation to be used later as leverage in negotiation. When trade is one sided and you simply accept an out of balance situation, this becomes the norm and you have no means of negotiation.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News