- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Milo's Book Has Been Canceled
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:21 pm to Hog on the Hill
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:21 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:
Yeah he straight up says that sexual relationships between younger boys and older men can be incredibly positive experiences.
I've twice typed up a response to this thread to explain exactly what Milo is talking about. I've deleted it twice because I don't want to sound like I endorse or condone the behavior. What I will say is that he is not talking about pedophillia in the clip, but that is definitely a logical conclusion to draw if you don't have a frame of reference for what he is actually describing.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:23 pm to MrLarson
quote:I'll stand shoulder to shoulder with anyone battling this on any front. Glad we're on the same page.
I'm not defending Milo so much as I am taken aback by the fake outrage over it.
Why are people not ripping Hollywood apart right now? If Milo is pimping pedo then why not demand that Hollywood out pedos?
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:24 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
Gay, adult men helping curious or shy gay teenagers to embrace their sexuality by.... embracing their sexuality.
That's what he is describing and you're fundamentally talking about a more mature adult taking advantage of the less mature teenager.
If I'm a 30 year old dude helping 14 year old girls come into their sexual prime by fingering their 14 year old pussies, I'm not a hero and I'm not normal. That is a perverted power and sexual relationship and one society should not endorse.
That's what he is describing and you're fundamentally talking about a more mature adult taking advantage of the less mature teenager.
If I'm a 30 year old dude helping 14 year old girls come into their sexual prime by fingering their 14 year old pussies, I'm not a hero and I'm not normal. That is a perverted power and sexual relationship and one society should not endorse.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:25 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:
Yeah he straight up says that sexual relationships between younger boys and older men can be incredibly positive experiences.
I don't understand how people are defending him.
People need to stop using the term "boy" and "pedophile". 14-17 year olds are teenagers and post-pubertal.
And such relationships (teenagers with men in their 20s-30s) are incredibly common among homosexuals. I find it bizarre people on the left are freaking out about it now.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:29 pm to Roger Klarvin
That doesn't mean it's healthy and something that should be normalized and protected.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:31 pm to AUbused
I hate responses that are only emoticons.
It tells me that someone can't defend their position.
I said that Milo's book is in high demand based on preorders. The cancelling of the book is a disruption of the free market as there is now a disruption in the supply that has nothing to do with organic supply and demand.
I never brought up the 1st Amemdment as it doesn't apply.
Can you address what I said with something more than an emoticon or should I just assume you can't handle a debate?
It tells me that someone can't defend their position.
I said that Milo's book is in high demand based on preorders. The cancelling of the book is a disruption of the free market as there is now a disruption in the supply that has nothing to do with organic supply and demand.
I never brought up the 1st Amemdment as it doesn't apply.
Can you address what I said with something more than an emoticon or should I just assume you can't handle a debate?
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:34 pm to Roger Klarvin
Also it seems like no one calls the 30 year old female teacher who bangs her 14 year old male student a pedophile.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:40 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
That doesn't mean it's healthy and something that should be normalized and protected.
But that's not the issue at hand. The claim is that Milo supports pedophilia.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:45 pm to Roger Klarvin
I think you're trying to parse the definition of pedophilia to ignore the fact he does support relationships that are not appropriate and not healthy.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:46 pm to boosiebadazz
Hugh Hefner banging 20 year olds isn't healthy or appropriate either.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:50 pm to Rebelgator
In the aggregate, 20 year olds are more mature than 14 year olds. This can lead to the debate about arbitrary 17/18 as the age of consent, but I think most people can agree 14 is a non-starter.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:53 pm to GRTiger
I really hope Breitbart drops his arse
This post was edited on 2/20/17 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:55 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
I have an idea: how about Milo tones down the deviant pervert shtick and starts talking meaningful politics again. You know, that thing that made him worthwhile to listen to before he started dressing up like a member of the village people and constantly referencing black cock.
I'm not interested in hearing any political commentator constantly discuss their sexual perversions, and it's no different with Milo.
I'm not interested in hearing any political commentator constantly discuss their sexual perversions, and it's no different with Milo.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:57 pm to Pecker
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:59 pm to Pecker
quote:
have an idea: how about Milo tones down the deviant pervert shtick and starts talking meaningful politics again. You know, that thing that made him worthwhile to listen to before he started dressing up like a member of the village people and constantly referencing black cock. I'm not interested in hearing any political commentator constantly discuss their sexual perversions, and it's no different with Milo.
Milo and Policy . He's only famous because of his inflammatory Bruno schtick
Posted on 2/20/17 at 7:59 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
but I think most people can agree 14 is a non-starter
I completely agree with this. But I'm also pretty sure my great grandmother got married at like 14 or 15 lol.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 8:01 pm to CommoDawg
quote:
Milo and Policy . He's only famous because of his inflammatory Bruno schtick
I just posted a video that shows otherwise. You should watch some of his debates and tv appearances before he started acting like a sexually deviant clown.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 8:02 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:Fine, "pedophile" is wrong in the strict sense that he's not describing pre-pubescent boys, but a grown man having sex with a minor boy is still extremely wrong and should never be condoned or defended.
People need to stop using the term "boy" and "pedophile". 14-17 year olds are teenagers and post-pubertal.
And such relationships (teenagers with men in their 20s-30s) are incredibly common among homosexuals. I find it bizarre people on the left are freaking out about it now.
You've picked a weird hill to die on.
This post was edited on 2/20/17 at 8:03 pm
Posted on 2/20/17 at 8:02 pm to Scoop
quote:
I said that Milo's book is in high demand based on preorders. The cancelling of the book is a disruption of the free market as there is now a disruption in the supply that has nothing to do with organic supply and demand.
No, this is the free market at work. Simon and schuster didn't want to be associated with an author that appears to advocate for pedophilia ( or if you want to mince terms hebephilia). They did this as consumers might elect to not buy their books if they kept this association. This is a rational decision on their part, and consumers do yield power to force their hands. If you don't like their decision, don't buy their books, maybe they will change their mind.
Conservatives love the concept of boycotts until they result in something they don't like.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News