When someone has a family, they make decisions with their family in mind. They support causes and institutions with their family in mind as well. Erode the family unit, and people begin living for themselves and less likely to mind what happens to their wealth, estate, etc. The government is the beneficiary, naturally. I'm sure you would agree, the family structure and presence of both parents is best for nurturing successive generations.

eta. I realize I'm not explicitly answering how it's bad for the people... I'm operating on the universal truth that larger government ends up being bad for the people. Source: human history.

This post was edited on 2/19/17 at 4:31 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by CorporateTiger

Member since Aug 2014

10700 posts

Posted on 2/19/17 at 4:31 pm to LSUminati

Well I just may have a brand new most batshit insane thread this board has ever come up with after reading this.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Tiger Tracker

Austin,TX

Member since Nov 2015

7232 posts

Posted on 2/19/17 at 4:31 pm to LSUminati

quote:
I'm sure you would agree, the family structure and presence of both parents is best for nurturing successive generations.

I think it doesn't matter if its a dad/dad mom/dad mom/mom single parent etc. So long as both parties are able to care for the spawn they produce. Most single parents didn't make that choice either.

quote:
When someone has a family, they make decisions with their family in mind. They support causes and institutions with their family in mind as well. Erode the family unit, and people begin living for themselves and less likely to mind what happens to their wealth, estate, etc.

Can you provide me any statistical data or research which proves this or is this just your assumption?

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board