- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So Obama put the nation at risk? WOW!
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:07 am
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:07 am
Let me see if I'm following this.
1- Dems blame Russia for Hillary not winning.
2- Obama sign an EO that allows the full force of 16 intel agencies to monitor Trump's transition teams and Russia.
3- They discover a past conversation between Flynn and a Russian guy.
4- They withhold that information for well over a month.
5- the whole time the dems are screaming that Flynn puts the nation at risk.
6- Trump is only told days after he is sworn in.
7- Trump moves to find out if Flynn is lying, and then ask for him to resign.
Why would the Obama admin with hold information that put the nations security at risk?
1- Dems blame Russia for Hillary not winning.
2- Obama sign an EO that allows the full force of 16 intel agencies to monitor Trump's transition teams and Russia.
3- They discover a past conversation between Flynn and a Russian guy.
4- They withhold that information for well over a month.
5- the whole time the dems are screaming that Flynn puts the nation at risk.
6- Trump is only told days after he is sworn in.
7- Trump moves to find out if Flynn is lying, and then ask for him to resign.
Why would the Obama admin with hold information that put the nations security at risk?
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:10 am to Jjdoc
You're gonna have a rough ride the next few years if this is how you're gonna melt every time Donald has a setback.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:11 am to Jjdoc
Um.... one- they were monitoring the Russian Ambassador (which we always do) and two, Sally Yates informed the White House of Flynn's malfeasance shortly after the inauguration over the objection of James Comey- heck, ratting out Flynn might be the real reason Trump fired her- Congress should look into that to see if its evidence of a cover-up.
This post was edited on 2/14/17 at 11:13 am
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:11 am to Jjdoc
He's out drumming up funding for social unrest in a massive scale. Its coming.
Book it.
Book it.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:12 am to JuiceTerry
LOL! That's not a melt. It's actually facts. HAHA!
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:12 am to Jjdoc
quote:
month. 5- the whole time the dems are screaming that Flynn p
False
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:13 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Let me see if I'm following this.
Hint: You're not.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:13 am to Jjdoc
quote:I don't think you've ever posted something that wasn't at least 70% untrue.
Jjdoc
#Fakethreads
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:13 am to bamarep
quote:
He's out drumming up funding for social unrest in a massive scale. Its coming.
Sadly, one cannot discount this.
Conceal carry all the time baws. All the damn time.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:15 am to montanagator
quote:
Um.... one- they were monitoring the Russian Ambassador (which we always do) and two, Sally Yates informed the White House of Flynn's malfeasance shortly after the inauguration over the objection of James Comey- heck, ratting out Flynn might be the real reason Trump fired her- Congress should look into that to see if its evidence of a cover-up.
So much verifiable wrongness in this post.
1- Obama signed an EO that directed this. It's been linked here many times... but here you go...
LINK
quote:
Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed the new rules on January 3rd, after Director of National Intelligence James Clapper approved them in December. President Barack Obama's administration passed the changes in its final days in the White House -- President-elect Donald Trump takes office on January 20th.
quote:
Sally Yates informed the White House of Flynn's malfeasance shortly after the inauguration over the objection of James Comey
NOPE! Even the WaPo states clearly that between the time of Jan 23rd and 30th Comey backed off of that.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:17 am to Jjdoc
quote:It's actually not, but even if it was, my point would still stand.
LOL! That's not a melt. It's actually facts. HAHA!
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:17 am to Jjdoc
So your claim is that they hadn't been monitoring the Russian ambassador's communications for years?
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:18 am to Navytiger74
quote:
I don't think you've ever posted something that wasn't at least 70% untrue.
Name one thing that's not true in the OP.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:19 am to Jjdoc
Its an attempt to make Trump look incompetent but this will only backfire bigly just like the other attempts.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:19 am to Jjdoc
quote:2 and 4, at minimum.
Name one thing that's not true in the OP.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:22 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
So your claim is that they hadn't been monitoring the Russian ambassador's communications for years?
This is why you come to wrong conclusions. My claim is that Obama signed an EO that placed all 16 agencies on the "Russian" links to Trump's team.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:23 am to Jjdoc
Lying to win the election is coming back around to bite Trump. Maneuvering with Russia before Inauguration is breaking the law. Here we go! Wow, what will we have in the next three weeks from this free wheeling administration?
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:24 am to Jjdoc
quote:I hate to break it to you but nobody needed an EO to tap the Russian embassy
1- Obama signed an EO that directed this
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News