Started By
Message

re: Can anyone logically defend the 21 drinking age law?

Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:52 am to
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
12725 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:52 am to
I can logically say 18 would be dumb but not 19 and above. Seniors in high school turn 18 so if they can buy that can filter down. Age limit should be 19 or 20 max so that eliminates high school students being able to buy
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 11:53 am
Posted by Thunder
Western by God Vernon Parish
Member since Mar 2006
2421 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:57 am to
Not only that the fricking state of Louisiana will allow my 18 year old son into a bar, then pop him for a oui for blowing a 0.023 on a breath test. Wish I sue the frick out of this state for allowing 18 year olds into a fricking bar even though the damn drinking age is 21..... I love Louisiana but this state is seriously fricked up
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 11:59 am
Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:00 pm to
Hang in there champ! In 2 or 3 years you will be old enough to legally get your drank on. We were all pissed at your age about the age requirement but you will have completely forgotten about when you are 21 and won't even hold a grudge.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33992 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:09 pm to
It's due to drunk driving. The legal drinking age used to be 18 before they found out that there was a considerable amount of drunk driving deaths caused by teenage drunk driving. So the government decided to raise the drinking age to 21 in the mid '80s. After they passed the law, the number of deaths related to drunk driving plummeted. As of 2011, the rate of deaths caused by drunk drivers is less than half of what it was in 1982.


Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18678 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:27 pm to
I'm gonna catch shite for this, but maybe we should up the age to vote and serve in the military to 21. Gain a little maturity before making big, life altering decisions.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15613 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:48 pm to
I'd increase it to 25.

Takes most longer than 21 to get a little maturity and responsibility
Posted by TimeOutdoors
AK
Member since Sep 2014
12129 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 4:38 pm to
I can. Turn on CNN or MSNBC and spend a few minutes watching the liberals protest. Now imagine them drunk. Mission accomplished.
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 7:23 pm to
It also creates some absurd situations. Since 21 is the drinking age, many (maybe all?) places also require a person to be 21 to serve alcohol. There is an exception to this, at least in some places, for "emancipated" minors. Here's the absurd result:

Emancipation is an action by which a person who is not an adult can be given the full powers of an adult to manage his own affairs, enter into contracts, etc. Since a person is an adult for all such purposes at the age of 18, emancipation is only available to people who are under 18, i.e. "minors".

So, a 14-year-old can become emancipated and be able to serve alcohol, but a 20-year-old can't.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 7:41 pm to
All you have to do is look at the violent protestors and know the 21 isn't as mature as it once was. In fact, if weed is completely legalized, it should be for 21+
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram