Started By
Message
locked post

Ginsberg mouthing off again

Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:32 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56127 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:32 am
Well here she is again espousing her political belief but yet people say a Justice should be impartial and base their rulings on what the constitution says and not what they want it to say. Yeah, right.

From a speech/interview at Stanford:

quote:

Ginsburg did not address the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court seat vacated by the late Justice Antonin Scalia or President Donald Trump's travel ban, which could end up before the high court. But she did say she would like to change the Electoral College, a comment that drew applause from the packed church. She did not elaborate.



LINK

This post was edited on 2/7/17 at 5:39 am
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
44005 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:35 am to
Too bad she will never see that day.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65227 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:39 am to
Hope that issue never becomes an issue and she recuses herself even though that's in plain writing in the constitution . This woman is a nasty women, and a known damn liar, and still waiting on her to fulfill her word to leave the country since Donald Trump was elected, liar!
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
56650 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:41 am to
Just a reminder: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is pro-pedophilia, and authored a report recommending age of consent be lowered to 12.
Posted by Ted2010
Member since Oct 2010
38958 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:53 am to
They would have to amend the Constitution in order to scrap the EC. Not going to happen any time soon.
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
34100 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:54 am to
Wat?

ETA: I never knew that. How in the hell did she ever make it to the SCOTUS?
This post was edited on 2/7/17 at 6:02 am
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11315 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:54 am to
Appointed by Clinton/Podesta...

LINK


quote:

Fears Grow Over Academic Efforts to Normalize Pedophilia


quote:

Cultural experts who agree with claims that the Supreme Court may have opened the door to legalizing pedophilia in its Lawrence v. Texas decision on private homosexual behavior point to the growing movement within academia to de-stigmatize pedophilia. Jan LaRue, chief counsel for Concerned Women for America (CWA), a Washington D.C.-based women's public policy group, noted Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that the decision "has nothing to do with minors." "We should hold (the Court) to that and anyone who tries to pervert the ruling even more than it is already by saying that it does protect pedophilia," LaRue told CNSNews.com. "However, the likes of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) and other pedophiles will certainly use it to seek legitimization for their behavior." On its website, NAMBLA Director David Thorstad claims: "Pederasty, like homosexuality, has existed, and exists, in all societies that have ever been studied. Homoeroticism is a ubiquitous feature of human experience, as even efforts to repress it confirm. Men and youths have always been attracted to each other, and, like homosexuality in general, their love is irrepressible."

Potential trouble on the Supreme Court However, restraining the Court may prove more difficult than expected. Responding to criticism aimed at Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) over his conclusions that the Lawrence decision could lead to legalized pedophilia and other sexual acts, the Catholic Family Association of America (CFAA) pointed to a potential pedophilia advocate on the Court itself. "Given that homosexual advocates are in a full court press to lower the age of consent as low as it can go, and pro-pedophile sitting Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg 's documented advocacy of lowering the age of consent to 12 years old, parents should be horrified that there are so few politicians, like Sen. Santorum, actually defending the family," Timothy Chichester, CFAA president, said April 23. Chichester was referring to a paper authored by Ginsburg entitled "Sex Bias in the U.S. Code," which was prepared for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977 The allegation was further substantiated by Robert Knight, director of CWA's Culture Institute, in "Homosexual Behavior and Pedophilia," an article he co-authored with the Family Research Council's Frank York. "When U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was an attorney for the ACLU, she co-authored a report recommending that the age of consent for sexual acts be lowered to 12 years of age," the article points out. Knight and York's footnoted documentation on this is as follows: "Sex Bias in the U.S. Code," Report for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, April 1977, p. 102, quoted in "Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Feminist World View," The Phyllis Schlafly Report, Vol. 26, No. 12, Section 1, p. 3. The paragraph (from the Ginsburg report) reads as follows: "'Eliminate the phrase "carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years" and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense. ... A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person. ... [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.'" LaRue said pedophiles may co-opt language used in the Lawrence decision regarding homosexuals; that laws against their behavior are a discriminatory attempt to harm them as a persecuted minority. And they will be supported, she claimed, by academia. Reclassifying pedophilia already subject to debate During its annual convention in May, the American Psychiatric Association hosted a symposium discussing the removal of pedophilia along with other categories of mental illness (collectively known as paraphilia) from its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). After much criticism following CNSNews.com coverage of the symposium, the APA issued a statement reiterating its position on pedophilia. But in his 1999 article "Harming the Little Ones: The Effects of Pedophilia on Children," Timothy Dailey, senior analyst for cultural studies with the Family Research Council, chronicled the APA's treatment of pedophilia in the DSM and compares it to the APA evolution of homosexuality. In DSM revisions, Dailey explained that APA "adds a subjective qualification similar to that which appeared with regard to homosexuality: The individual must be 'markedly distressed' by his own pedophilic activity to be considered needful of therapy," Dailey wrote, adding that in the latest revision, pedophilia "is to be considered a paraphilia when the behavior causes 'clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning.'"



This post was edited on 2/7/17 at 5:57 am
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:56 am to
Are you saying Ruth Ginsburg likes to play very small harmonicas
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:14 am to
You're all about some fake news
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26372 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:21 am to
Pedo's appointing pedo's!
Posted by Wimp Lo
My nipples look like Milk Duds
Member since Aug 2016
4548 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:24 am to
quote:

You're all about some fake news




You can read her testimony here. It's a gpo.gov pdf autodownload. She advocated for carnal knowledge statutes to be lowered to younger than 12 years old.

LINK
This post was edited on 2/7/17 at 6:27 am
Posted by tilco
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Nov 2013
14321 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:24 am to
quote:


You're all about some fake news



Is he wrong? Are you saying RBG didn't advocate for lowering the age of consent to 12?
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
20911 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:27 am to
There is not likely to be a case before the court on whether to change the Electoral College. That's part of the structure of the constitution.

If it were to happen, she might need to recuse. But there won't be such a case, so relax.

She really should back off on the comments though. Next thing you know she'll be embarrassing the nation by tweeting shite to celebrities and grabbing men by the cock just because she is famous and can get away with it.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56127 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:28 am to
quote:

You're all about some fake news


Then give us the real stuff so you won't make yourself look/not look like an arse.
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:28 am to
Commies hate the amendment process because they can't cheat, so they cheat buy saying x means y.

Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11315 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:29 am to
quote:

You're all about some fake news


You are retroactively applying "fake news" to a 2008 article. Well played.

I post information (if you look at all of my posts in aggregate, they often times come from the NY Times, the Guardian, the Atlantic). The reader is allowed to use their own discretion to make big boy/girl decisions.

Labels (equally as fake as the recently made up construct of "fake news") do not bother me






This post was edited on 2/7/17 at 6:33 am
Posted by Wimp Lo
My nipples look like Milk Duds
Member since Aug 2016
4548 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:29 am to
Go to my link, but be warned. It's an autoload off from gpo.gov.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56127 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:32 am to
I believe you. I'm not arguing with you.
Posted by Bubbles Up
Member since Jul 2011
2937 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:36 am to
And she wants this why? So the leftist "elites" on the coasts can rule the rest of the country? How totalitarian of her.

She should go back to high school civics and learn how the Constitution works. And that judges don't get to make the rules.
Posted by tigersbh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
12625 posts
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:42 am to
quote:

a Justice should be impartial and base their rulings on what the constitution says and not what they want it to say.


There are 4 Justices that need to learn this: Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan, and Sotameyer.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram