- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Has govt ever defied a president like this?
Posted on 2/4/17 at 7:20 am to deltaland
Posted on 2/4/17 at 7:20 am to deltaland
quote:
Completely ignoring EOs, judges blocking shite with no legal reason.
Right. No legal reason at all. Absolutely none. Theyre just making it up.......just like the protesters in fact: they have no factual grounds or legal basis for their concerns about Trump's recent actions -they're only doing it to be mean to Trump. Unbelievable.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 7:24 am to a want
How bad will you melt when this gets shot down, because it will. Clearly defined in law is the fact the executive controls immigration. What if someone comes in over the next week and shoots your mother? What if Trump gets pissed and decides to stop being nice to Dems and turns this into white utopia?
Posted on 2/4/17 at 7:28 am to a want
The Dems have already stated that they were going to fight Trump in many ways. Once of those stated methods was in the courts. I suspect that there will be a historical number of court cases filled against a President over the next 4 years.
I also suspect that this escalation of an existing strategy will lead to more of the same from R's the next time a D is President.
I completely support checks and balances but using the courts just to disrupt government should have reprecussions.
One way tournament baseball handles disputes is requiring the complaintant to put out $100. If they lose their protest, they lose the $100. Perhaps something similar should apply to protesting the President in the court system. This would make both sides really think about what they are doing.
My other fear is that the Rs use the nuclear option for the Supreme Court nominee. That's just going to make the Ds do it next time. We'll be living in a nuclear political age. That doesn't sound wonderful to me.
Everything needs to be toned down from the rioting to overzealous use of the courts (if that is indeed what's happening).
These are not good times but this has been coming to a head and both parties are equally responsible in different ways and sometimes even in the same ways.
I also suspect that this escalation of an existing strategy will lead to more of the same from R's the next time a D is President.
I completely support checks and balances but using the courts just to disrupt government should have reprecussions.
One way tournament baseball handles disputes is requiring the complaintant to put out $100. If they lose their protest, they lose the $100. Perhaps something similar should apply to protesting the President in the court system. This would make both sides really think about what they are doing.
My other fear is that the Rs use the nuclear option for the Supreme Court nominee. That's just going to make the Ds do it next time. We'll be living in a nuclear political age. That doesn't sound wonderful to me.
Everything needs to be toned down from the rioting to overzealous use of the courts (if that is indeed what's happening).
These are not good times but this has been coming to a head and both parties are equally responsible in different ways and sometimes even in the same ways.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 8:25 am to a want
No one said the Judge is bought by Soros? Because he's paid all those people to protest, right?
#alternativefacts
#alternativefacts
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News