Started By
Message

re: Concealed carry for veterans

Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:56 am to
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65066 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:56 am to
Pop kern

quote:

I get it - you don't like me.


Don't worry he don't like me either since I tried to take his livelihood by sitting next to my wife at a class that I didn't need.
Posted by cdaniel76
Covington, LA
Member since Feb 2008
19699 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:03 am to
I'll never understand why guys get so defensive about things like this. You both give classes. You both are required to give a certain amount of instruction on a subject. Who cares what the other guy is doing??? Just worry about your classes and your people and ensuring you're giving them the information that's required, AND THAT THEY'RE ABSORBING IT MOST IMPORTANTLY!, and go about your business.

If one guy wants to do the bare minimum to get by or another guy wants to go above and beyond the minimum requirements, WHO CARES?

Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11925 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:11 am to
quote:

If one guy wants to do the bare minimum to get by or another guy wants to go above and beyond the minimum requirements, WHO CARES?



I don't have a problem with someone who gives a minimal class but meets all the requirements.

The issue I have is when someone says I am teaching information that is contradictory to state law.
Posted by cdaniel76
Covington, LA
Member since Feb 2008
19699 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:13 am to
quote:

The issue I have is when someone says I am teaching information that is contradictory to state law.


I see your point there. But don't get into it with someone on a public forum. Just makes both of you look bad even if you are justified. (I like and appreciate both of you for your contributions to this forum so I'm not picking a side here. Just stating how it looks from my POV).
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11925 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:18 am to
Oh trust me, I won't get into a pissing match. But I will defend myself when someone says I am teaching wrongful information.

quote:

(I like and appreciate both of you for your contributions to this forum so I'm not picking a side here. Just stating how it looks from my POV).


Posted by Pepperidge
Slidell
Member since Apr 2011
4314 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:

so I'm not picking a side here.


lets see now...

one instructor is for constitutional carry, even though it may affect his income from teaching the classes, but believes in supporting Constitutional rights

and the the other is against constitutional carry for selfish reasons though will not publicly admit it, yet pimps his services and even advertises his CCW teachings in his signature...(Ban?)

yeah... I'm gonna have to go with Bapple on being the better man in this one.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65066 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

What you'll actually learn in a CCW class depends a lot on the quality of the class//experience of the instructor. You might learn very little. Or worse, you might be taught stuff that contradicts Louisiana's laws and rules (There's one who posts here fairly regularly who fits this description).


This is really the part that shouldn't have been said unless he was ready to call someone out. He knows how this board is. If you are going to do that, just man up and name names if you ask me.

ETA: And it might not have been Bapple. But still, if you have an issue with them just say it.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 1:47 pm
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

I don't care if you do or don't.

The reason I mention it is because the instructors group on Facebook helps us self-police the instructing community. Some individuals have made errors in the past and have corrected the mistakes with feedback from other instructors.

quote:
3. I assume you don't doubt that instructors are out there who shouldn't be teaching -- after all you're the guy who once posted " One thing I wished LSP did in regards to training their instructors is give a thorough explanation of the laws regarding carry and lethal force. All they did was say, "Oh, you have NRA Basic Pistol Certification. Cool. Here's your approval."


I'm sure there are instructors out there teaching either a bare bones NRA basic pistol class or just signing certificates. I won't deny that.

Are you trying to imply that I'm teaching wrongful information because of that statement? I had to spend a lot more personal time researching the lethal force laws without having a starting point. I definitely think LSP can improve on that.

quote:
4. If you want to publicly list names, have at it.


I see what you did there.

I get it - you don't like me. But my classes do not teach anything that contradicts Louisiana lethal force law.


Dear Mr. Bapple:

1. I don't make a habit on engaging in internet debates. especially with strangers. So I'm gonna respond to the post I quoted above, and then you or anyone else who has been offended can say or do whatever they wish.

2. I readily acknowledge that I, as a redneck, lack the ability to communicate clearly. So I'll try to put this in words you can follow. You can just read the words. You don't need to read between the lines. You don't need to make inferences.

3. Regarding the Facebook question and your comment "The reason I mention it is because the instructors group on Facebook helps us self-police the instructing community:" I apologize but there's no nice way to say that "self-policing the instructing community" is a poor approach to solving problems. If I know of a problem with an instructor, I will contact the people who can solve it. Exchanging complaints on Facebook might work - my approach has worked, and I'm pretty confident it will continue to.

4. Your statement ("Are you trying to imply that I'm teaching wrongful information because of that statement? I had to spend a lot more personal time researching the lethal force laws without having a starting point. I definitely think LSP can improve on that".) is very disingenuous. Nobody said you are teaching incorrect info -- but back when the original thread was posted, you posted opinions that were clearly at variance with LRS.

You seemed appreciative back then when I corrected you. At least that's how I would construe your comments when posted: "Good to know. Post edited. I guess my statement was a half-truth in that it isn't necessarily backed by law but there are still consequences. Thanks for the clarification."

I presume that you didn't teach any of that to students. In fact, at the time you acknowledged that you had not trained more than a handful of people - total. I hope and presume you learned all that and a lot more before you actually began teaching CCW class on a regular basis (assuming you're doing so).

Which brings me to my last point:

5. You posted: "I get it - you don't like me."

Dude - ignoring for a minute that your comment is childish whining, I don't even know you. I have never met you (although I'd like to).

I have met your dad -- shot clays with him while chatting for an hour. He seemed to be a very nice fellow, and (no pun intended) the apple probably didn't fall too far from the tree. But you really strike me as insecure. And a bit irrational.

You're the guy who calls people insulting names on a public forum, and then whines, "You don't like me." (I might be mistaken but I think it was you who called a fellow member "the resident douche" on this board within the past 48 hours). Ignoring the fact that it violates the Board's CoC, it apparently leads you to assume that I would react by disliking you.

Without (hopefully) sounding overly arrogant, my world is a lot broader than internet chat rooms. I don't know you, I don't like or dislike you. And I really try to avoid reacting to people. (I guess you can call this reply a "reaction") I certainly don't decide whom I "like" or whom I "dislike" based on internet posts.

Some days you seem like the proverbial "nice guy" (which I suspect you are), and other days you whine that people don't like you and call them a douche. I may or may not fit your definition of a douche. I certainly wouldn't argue with a label of curmudgeon. The older I get the less gladly I suffer fools. (NOTICE: I didn't say you're a fool. I'm referring to life in general). But if that bothers you, and you want everyone to post in a "little miss sunshine" manner, with zero sarcasm or satire, I'm sorry.

I get it that you are an NRA Basic Pistol Instructor -- you and me about 20,000 other people. Actually I have no idea how many -- I do know it's an incredibly low bar that requires nothing more than spending between 1.5 and two days in a classroom. But having that certificate does nothing to increase the validity of my opinions (or yours) and does nothing enhance the value of comments I (or you) might post) here.

If you're happy with your Facebook policing, I hope you continue. If you're teaching sound doctrine (and I assume you probably are), I hope you keep teaching. If I were to determine for a fact that you're teaching sound doctrine, I'd add you to the very short list of people to whom I refer students who can't fit into my classes. If I were to determine you're teaching "heretical" material, I'd first contact you - and if that didn't work I'd contact the folks who regulate instructors.

If any of the foregoing offends you (which isn't my intent), I guess you can chalk it up to my being a curmudgeon (or whatever term you prefer).

If you really want to know how big of a jerk I am (or "douche," to use your eloquent term) talk to the folks who have taken my class. I'm sure you'll find a few with negative things to say (like Broke -- who thought it was so good he recommended it to his wife, but changed his tune when he didn't get to attend a second time at no charge). There are well over 1000 people who have taken my class (many of who took their initial classes from other instructors). After spending 9 hours in a classroom, these folks probably have a pretty good idea of my personality. (This approach isn't valid if you talk to my wife -- don't believe a word she says ).

My phone number is 225-766-4422. My address is 10275 Siegen Lane. I will be happy to address any other complaints or issues you have by phone or in person -- clearly too much gets "lost in the translation" when posting on gun forums.
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:04 pm to
Dear Mr. Broke:

Why would I dislike you. You're a great reference.

You took my class, and you were so impressed you recommended it to your wife. It was so great, you even wanted accompany her.

But (as is documented in that epic thread) you changed your tune when you found out that you'd have to pay to attend the class a second time. I apologize for my money-grubbing materialism.

I mistakenly assumed that when people go to the theater to watch a move, and go back the next month with their wife/girlfriend, they'd have to pay again. Same concept at a concert, or at a bar that has a cover charge. Silly me.

"Pay once and you're covered" is clearly the appropriate rule. So please accept my apology, and my offer to give you free attendance at a future class. Send me your contact info and, as soon as I have an empty seat, it's yours. (This might take a few years. I've never had a class that wasn't full with a waiting list.)

/sarcasm

Posted by Theboot32
Member since Jan 2016
2435 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:11 pm to
I did mine recently, yes veterans get a 50% discount if the DD214 is supplied

dude, make 20 copies of that thing and keep them in random spots, i need it all the time now it seems and always have one handy

eta:

quote:

d) *NOTE* Effective August 1, 2016 Act 44 of the 2016 Louisiana Legislative Session exempts HONORABLY DISCHARGED veterans of the U.S. armed forces from all fees associated with 5-year or lifetime concealed handgun permits.


well damn!

i actually submitted my paperwork in september, and paid the damn fee, I wish they would have returned it!
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 4:16 pm
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11925 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

1. I don't make a habit on engaging in internet debates. especially with strangers.


I actually appreciate that you finally are. That's how people learn things - to listen to differing opinions.


You say:

quote:

"The reason I mention it is because the instructors group on Facebook helps us self-police the instructing community:" I apologize but there's no nice way to say that "self-policing the instructing community" is a poor approach to solving problems.


Then follow by saying:

quote:

You seemed appreciative back then when I corrected you. At least that's how I would construe your comments when posted: "Good to know. Post edited. I guess my statement was a half-truth in that it isn't necessarily backed by law but there are still consequences. Thanks for the clarification."


I'm not sure what exact thread you are responding to but you just proved my point. Self-policing does work when you can basically crowd-source the best way to solve a problem while staying within the lines of the law. The Facebook group for LA CHP Instructors has been infinitely valuable for me and to dismiss it would be unwise. I'm not saying you have to use it but to pretend it has no value is foolish. I appreciate your correction and want to learn from those before me (you being one of them).

quote:

Nobody said you are teaching incorrect info -- but back when the original thread was posted, you posted opinions that were clearly at variance with LRS.


Are you referring to the one on Constitutional Carry?

Notice I bolded "opinions." Just because I may not agree with a certain law doesn't mean I don't teach it. I don't have to be in exact belief with all current laws on the books as long as I am teaching the law.

quote:

I presume that you didn't teach any of that to students. In fact, at the time you acknowledged that you had not trained more than a handful of people - total. I hope and presume you learned all that and a lot more before you actually began teaching CCW class on a regular basis (assuming you're doing so).


And again you prove that self-policing works. If I hadn't been corrected I may have kept making that mistake, even though I'm not sure what the exact post was.

quote:

You're the guy who calls people insulting names on a public forum, and then whines


I admit that calling you a douche was something I rarely do (call out someone else). But when a new shooter comes on the board and has made some less-than-stellar choices for handguns, to sit there and belittle him without offering any reasonable solutions does nothing but make us look bad. You call it satire but the guy obviously wasn't a regular poster and has probably never noticed you. I felt it was my position to say we don't all come across that way.

quote:

Ignoring the fact that it violates the Board's CoC, it apparently leads you to assume that I would react by disliking you.


So I should be silenced/banned for giving an opinion about how I thought someone was acting?

quote:

Dude - ignoring for a minute that your comment is childish whining, I don't even know you. I have never met you (although I'd like to).


I highly doubt this is true but thanks for your time.

Remember that I was not the one that started this. When you said what Broke quoted, that's what made me immediately defend myself. I honestly don't care if you like me or don't like me but if you're going to imply I'm teaching material that is contradictory to law and not say it directly to me, that's disingenuous.

End of online debate. Thanks again.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 4:36 pm
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

but if you're going to imply I'm teaching material that is contradictory to law and not say it directly to me, that's disingenuous.
I'll close by saying you need to learn to distinguish between imply & infer.

Your knee-jerk defensive reactions and instant assumptions that people are out to get you isn't healthy. It sounds as if you're the one who isn't sure if he's teaching "the gospel." Hopefully you are.

eta: The post to which I referred had nothing to do with "constitutional carry." You posted interpretations of state law that were clearly wrong. Why anyone would post one thing here, and claim to be teaching something else to students is weird.
Good luck.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 5:08 pm
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20743 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 9:14 pm to
My dad got his not sure what he paid.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 9:15 pm
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65066 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 9:26 am to
quote:

You took my class, and you were so impressed you recommended it to your wife. It was so great, you even wanted accompany her.



I hope the entire paragraph is sarcasm because I never took your class. Just fyi. I took mine in Baker.


And let me give you a little business advice if it's not inappropriate. I've been a business owner for a long time:

quote:

But (as is documented in that epic thread) you changed your tune when you found out that you'd have to pay to attend the class a second time. I apologize for my money-grubbing materialism.

I mistakenly assumed that when people go to the theater to watch a move, and go back the next month with their wife/girlfriend, they'd have to pay again. Same concept at a concert, or at a bar that has a cover charge. Silly me.



It's not about money grubbing. It's about making customers happy and wanting to use your service. Wanting to tell people about your service. There are dozens of you around Baton Rouge. They all charge about $125. I asked you because I was going to bring my wife to your class:

Wife: $125

Then when you refused to just let me stick a chair in the corner (you were providing no service I needed. I'm trained military and already had a CC permit. So I don't honestly believe you could have provided me anything I didn't already know), you lost that $125 and every future person I've sent through courses:

Wife: $125
Daughter: $125
Neighbor: $125
Mother in law and father in law: $250
TOTAL LOST REVENUE: $625

All because I was going to occupy 1 chair. Hell bring another chair in. I don't throw out a husband and wife in my office because the husband doesn't have accounts with me and the wife does. Sometimes we do work for free and it comes back 10 fold. I know you are incredibly busy and have all the money you need. You can run your business however you feel. But this is just my take. I'm not trying to drag this topic up again.

It's actually been funny to me since it happened and I always joke about it here. It has no impact on me or my life and I'm sure the same applies to you. But I choose to try and actively not have one person upset with what I've done as a business. Referrals are my life blood.
This post was edited on 1/13/17 at 9:39 am
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 9:32 am to
quote:


I hope the entire paragraph is sarcasm because I never took your class. Just fyi. I took mine in Baker.
It was sarcasm -- it was offered in jest, wasn't trying to offend.

I presume you took your class with Gordon Hutchinson (he teaches in Baker). He does a really good job in his classes, in my opinion - especially the legal issues.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65066 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 9:40 am to
I edited while you were posting. Take it as friendly information. Or don't take it at all. I just felt compelled to post it.
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 10:27 am to
Good info - I'm always interested in feedback. And I appreciate the fact that you knew I was joking (my redneck attempt at humor).

As far as the original "issue":

1. I try to maintain a strict limit on class size. My conference room is small, so 10 people gets crowded. Adding another chair becomes an "elbow to elbow" proposition during a nine hour class.

2. My classes are always full, with a waiting list (which just proves that people aren't checking out their instructor carefully enough ). I turn away 20-30 people every class. So even though you say it costs me nothing to add a chair, if I had room for that chair I always have people who would want that seat. So it does/would cost me money.

3. Believe it or not, I don't teach this stuff just for the money. if I did I'd charge whole lot more than $85 ($65 for renewal). I do find that people pay more attention when they have an investment in the process.

4. In a typical class 1/3 - 1/2 of the students pay menothing. These are friends, clients, military dependents, women who are being stalked, etc. These are people who simply can't afford the $85.

5. If you can't afford the class fee, I'll add you or your wife, daughter, to the pro bono list. But I didn't have the impression that you're in the "starving, hand to mouth" category.

6. Yes I care about referrals. Fortunately or unfortunately, I've been doing this long enough that people know my class is unique and apparently think I do a semi-decent job of teaching. I post student feedback on my redneck website that sorta backs this up.

7. I realize your main point is that you didn't need the class, therefore I should have allowed you attend for free. I don't think we're gonna ever agree on that one. But I'm not offended, I don't think poorly of you because we disagree, and I enjoy the "standing joke" that we have because of it.

8. Your posts on this board are one of the reasons I click on the site a couple of times a day. I value your opinions & comments (except for the nefarious free seat question ). Thanks again for the feedback.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65066 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Your posts on this board are one of the reasons I click on the site a couple of times a day. I value your opinions & comments (except for the nefarious free seat question ). Thanks again for the feedback.



Seriously, I add nothing of value to the OB. Absolutely nothing.
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Seriously, I add nothing of value to the OB. Absolutely nothing.
Well, that's one more thing we'll have to agree to disagree on.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram