- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obama's advice to Trump: Don't use executive orders too much
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:35 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:35 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Man, what a fricking racist pussy you are.
It's funny how no one worries about it until a black man issues EOs.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:36 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Yes because establishing the Bob Hope American Patriot Award is news.
W issued 291 EOs to Obama's 260. Where you crying about it then?
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:40 pm to SEClint
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:43 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
They shouldn't be
Tell that to Ronald Reagan with his 381 EOs, or Richard Nixon with his 346, or Ike with his 484, or Harding's 522, or Taft's 724, or Hoover's 968, or Coolidge's 1,203!
All Republicans, BTW.
They kind of make Obama's 260 look rather paltry.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:45 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Okay. Dig em up and I'll tell them
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:45 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Man, what a fricking racist pussy you are.
I'm not the one singling out the black man for doing what all the white men did. Why are you? What else could possibly make Obama's 260 EOs any worse than Reagan's 381? Was Reagan that much more of a tyrant than Obama?
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:46 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
To be fair, Obama had a Republican Congress when he was signing all those executive orders
Those Republicans were sent to Washington by the American people to represent them. Is it your opinion that congressional representation can be thwarted by POTUS when the will of the people differ from the the president's ideology?
quote:
, he really didn't have any choice as the Congress wouldn't allow any bills (
I don't believe anyone prevented more bills from being debated than the illustrious harry reid.
This post was edited on 12/20/16 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:47 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Sticking with the numbers versus substance, sweet.
I'm not the one singling out the black man for doing what all the white men did. Why are you? What else could possibly make Obama's 260 EOs any worse than Reagan's 381? Was Reagan that much more of a tyrant than Obama?
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:48 pm to Jbird
quote:
Yes because establishing the Bob Hope American Patriot Award is news.
And the Waiver Under the Trade Act of 1974 With Respect to the Republic of Belarus isn't?
Face it, Obama hasn't done anything regarding EOs that most other presidents did. But for SOME reason, Obama gets singled out.
Why?
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:49 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
It's funny how no one worries about it until a black man issues EOs
And there it is.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:49 pm to Centinel
quote:
You might want to do a bit of research and compare those executive orders in terms of scope and impact.
An executive order making Tuesday "Federal Taco Day" is exactly what executive orders should be used for.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:49 pm to tss22h8
Obama's Presidency was so bad that even when his party nominated a much more qualified candidate to be his successor, she lost to a WWE Hall of Famer. I'd say Obama is dishing out some sound advice.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:50 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Because most EOs are symbolic and don't affect the lives of American's. Obama was pursuing actual legislation through EO. Major difference.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:50 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Oh you know why, have the balls to say it.
Why?
Anyone who calls out anything the only black president does is racist cuz you know all the others were whiteys.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:54 pm to Jbird
quote:
Sticking with the numbers versus substance, sweet
You're a fool.
Here's one of Nixon's EOs:
Executive Order 11615 of August 15, 1971
Providing for Stabilization of Prices, Rents, Wages, and Salaries
Section 1.?
(a) ? Prices, rents, wages, and salaries shall be stabilized for a period of 90 days from the date hereof at levels not greater than the highest of those pertaining to a substantial volume of actual transactions by each individual, business, firm or other entity of any kind during the 30-day period ending August 14, 1971, for like or similar commodities or services. If no transactions occurred in that period, the ceiling will be the highest price, rent, salary or wage in the nearest preceding 30-day period in which transactions did occur. No person shall charge, assess, or receive, directly or indirectly in any transaction prices or rents in any form higher than those permitted hereunder, and no person shall, directly or indirectly, pay or agree to pay in any transaction wages or salaries in any form, or to use any means to obtain payment of wages and salaries in any form, higher than those permitted hereunder, whether by retroactive increase or otherwise.
(b) ? Each person engaged in the business of selling or providing commodities or services shall maintain available for public inspection a record of the highest prices or rents charged for such or similar commodities or services during the 30-day period ending August 14, 1971.
(c) ? The provision of section 1 and 2 hereof shall not apply to the prices charged for raw agricultural products.
Now you show me where Obama tried to initiate wage and price controls through an EO.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:54 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I'm not the one singling out the black man for doing what all the white men did. Why are you? What else could possibly make Obama's 260 EOs any worse than Reagan's 381? Was Reagan that much more of a tyrant than Obama?
Hey look! They did it too! So it's okay, right?! Wrong hombre. First, I wasn't around then so it's frivolous for me to be mad about it. Nothing i can do about it. But just because those before you do it doesn't make it right.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:54 pm to ballscaster
quote:
a much more qualified candidate
quote:
WWE Hall of Famer
Other than being on one episode of Smackdown, what has the god emperor done to warrant Hall of Fame status as a wrestler?
quote:
I'd say Obama is dishing out some sound advice.
you're an idiot if you think that hypocritical statements about abuse of power is "sound."
This post was edited on 12/20/16 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:54 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:So you argue numbers, now you flip to substance. I see you failed to drop any of Odrama's EOs in here.
Now you show me where Obama tried to initiate wage and price controls through an EO.
This post was edited on 12/20/16 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:55 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Because most EOs are symbolic and don't affect the lives of American's. Obama was pursuing actual legislation through EO. Major difference.
Holy shite, just because you're ignorant doesn't mean no one else knows anything.
Look up Nixon Shock to learn about affecting the lives of Americans through fiat.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News