- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Misogynistic/Xenophobic
Posted on 11/15/16 at 10:05 am to MustangGTech
Posted on 11/15/16 at 10:05 am to MustangGTech
Some definitions of these common liberal buzzwords:
Xenophobia - intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries.
Misogynistic - strongly prejudiced against women.
They use xenophobe to describe anyone who is against ILLEGAL immigration and the taking in of mass numbers of un-vetted refugees. It's dangerous and we can't afford it. That is a policy issue and is not based in fear. There is nothing "irrational" about wanting to protect our country and our financial futures.
They use misogynistic to describe anyone who voted against or otherwise criticizes Hillary Clinton. Nevermind that Hillary is a liar, bad for the country, and just an a-hole. This dislike for her is not based on strong prejudice, though. They call Trump a misogynist because he criticized HRC, but if he was really "strongly prejudicial to women", he would never allow one to run his campaign.
I am tired of all of this labeling from the liberal left, and I am not the only one, as we learned on November 8th. Not long ago, anyone who opposed a liberal's idiotic rhetoric was instantly labeled a racist. They over used that one, so now they attack others with a variety of "phobes" and "ists". It's funny because many of these liberals will parrot those words without knowing what they mean.
Liberals use these labels as weapons. It's all they have. They cannot argue policy or defend their position on anything, because all of their positions are based on "feelings".
Xenophobia - intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries.
Misogynistic - strongly prejudiced against women.
They use xenophobe to describe anyone who is against ILLEGAL immigration and the taking in of mass numbers of un-vetted refugees. It's dangerous and we can't afford it. That is a policy issue and is not based in fear. There is nothing "irrational" about wanting to protect our country and our financial futures.
They use misogynistic to describe anyone who voted against or otherwise criticizes Hillary Clinton. Nevermind that Hillary is a liar, bad for the country, and just an a-hole. This dislike for her is not based on strong prejudice, though. They call Trump a misogynist because he criticized HRC, but if he was really "strongly prejudicial to women", he would never allow one to run his campaign.
I am tired of all of this labeling from the liberal left, and I am not the only one, as we learned on November 8th. Not long ago, anyone who opposed a liberal's idiotic rhetoric was instantly labeled a racist. They over used that one, so now they attack others with a variety of "phobes" and "ists". It's funny because many of these liberals will parrot those words without knowing what they mean.
Liberals use these labels as weapons. It's all they have. They cannot argue policy or defend their position on anything, because all of their positions are based on "feelings".
3
Posted on 11/15/16 at 10:10 am to BooBaDoo
quote:
Not long ago, anyone who opposed a liberal's idiotic rhetoric was instantly labeled a racist. They over used that one, so now they attack others with a variety of "phobes" and "ists".
Alinsky's Rules for Radicals #6 and #7
quote:
“A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
“A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 10:24 am to BooBaDoo
Remember when all of those Democrats crossed party lines to vote for McCain because they were excited about the prospect of a female Vice President? Or how the media adored her and championed her in the name of feminism? Or all of the accolades given to Herman Cain and Dr. Carson as black presidential candidates? The Democrats arrogance + ignorance got them to where we are today, crying in their safe spaces.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 10:28 am to BooBaDoo
quote:This is the dumbest straw man. There is a thorough vetting process in place for Syrian refugees.
They use xenophobe to describe anyone who is against ILLEGAL immigration and the taking in of mass numbers of un-vetted refugees
The claims of misogyny are not because people (or Trump) criticize Hillary. It has more to do with the words Trump has used to describe women over the past several decades. He's criticized them for their looks, their weight, etc. Not to mention the numerous allegations of sexual assault, and his recorded comments about grabbing women by the pussy.
To say it's just because he criticizes Hillary is farcical.
I totally understand the pushback against these accusations of xenophobia and misogyny--I'm sure there are a lot of Trump supporters who legitimately are not these things. But I think you need to take a more careful look at why these accusations are being made. It's not for the reasons you described. The real reasons are much more reasonable than you seem to think.
This post was edited on 11/15/16 at 10:29 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News