Started By
Message

re: 5th Grade Social Studies: Abraham Lincoln

Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:22 pm to
Posted by Bamapossum
Alabama
Member since Jan 2006
1105 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:22 pm to
Jefferson is the original democrat. His view for a democratic America was destroyed by the industrial revolution and the decline of agrarianism. Without owning your own farm, you can't truly be self-reliant.
This post was edited on 11/14/16 at 5:23 pm
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22635 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

quote:
EDIT: STOP applying past issues to the contemporary.
THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE TEACHER DID!

THAT IS THE POINT!


Exactly! And his did happen and I'm not gonna go raise hell because I like his teachers and don't think they mean any harm. In fact I'd bet his teacher MAGA'd. I took a few issues (not the ones I listed earlier) and showed him how none of that even existed then so such a statement as what his teacher made, or atleast how he took it, was absurd. He seems to understand. I'm not one to lie about these things, they come up occasionally and a simple "your teacher is wrong" usually suffices. I don't encourage My kids to even discuss politics as I told them "go be a kid, all that crap your friends talk about is straight from their parents mouths".
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17068 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Yikes. First time I am seeing that quote from Lincoln. But yes he didn't care about black people. He was adamant about preserving the Union as one country.


There's other quotes from him like this too. That particular quote took place in the debates between him and Douglas in 1858.
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
19067 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE TEACHER DID!

THAT IS THE POINT!
She was WRONG to do so, and she should NOT have done so with fifth graders who can't think. I completely agree with that.

But would Lincoln be a democrat today? Possibly of the establishment variety.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22635 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

quote: But you did. Words have meaning. Can you dispute what I wrote? No, you cannot. Bourbon segregationists/Jim Crow Democrats of the 1870s and 80s WOULD 100% be Republicans today. That doesn't not mean they would be pro segregation right now. It's called an anachronism. Holy shite.

I'd say they'd have their own party, you know since Republicans don't support segregation and voted overwhelmingly for civil rights
Posted by AU66
Northport Al
Member since Sep 2006
3264 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Yikes. First time I am seeing that quote from Lincoln.


don`t feel bad most people haven`t, file that under the ole winners write the history file
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124273 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

But would Lincoln be a democrat today?
Would he be Paul Ryan or would he be Harry Reid?
I'd guess the answer is "Who knows?"

This teacher certainly doesn't.
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22467 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:55 pm to
Probably neither. Lincoln was no free trader, he was a protectionist that supported very high tarrifs. Lincoln would not be considered a globalist today, Paul Ryan might be.
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
19067 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

Would he be Paul Ryan or would he be Harry Reid?
I'd guess the answer is "Who knows?"

This teacher certainly doesn't.
Agreed. I was only asserting that I believe we can be fairly confident of the opposite based on history. Southern democrats from 1877 to 1948 represent the republican party today. For those not alive, their sons and daughters do.
That doesn't have anything to do with segregation, something our OP just can't figure out.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

I know one thing. Segregationist Democrats back then are today's Republicans, and that's indisputable.


No, you are a liar
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
19067 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

I'd say they'd have their own party, you know since Republicans don't support segregation and voted overwhelmingly for civil rights

This just tells me you don't "get" what I'm saying.

Segregation and Civil Rights are not an issue. The old segregationist Dems would be Republicans today based on the same reason they favored segregation (small federal government and states' rights).
Now that's not the only reason they favored segregation...many were of course "racists." I place quotes around racists because I do not believe it's fair to call someone who lived in the south in the 1870s a racist.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22635 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

quote: Would he be Paul Ryan or would he be Harry Reid? I'd guess the answer is "Who knows?" This teacher certainly doesn't. Agreed. I was only asserting that I believe we can be fairly confident of the opposite based on history. Southern democrats from 1877 to 1948 represent the republican party today. For those not alive, their sons and daughters do. That doesn't have anything to do with segregation, something our OP just can't figure out.

What in the hell do southern democrats living after Lincoln have to do with this teachers statements as perceived by my son? Republicans and democrats flip flop on issues all the time..that doesn't make her statement any more accurate or yours for that matter
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53181 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:02 pm to
I hate when you people judge hardworking teachers, most of you wouldn't last one day as a teacher, much less pass the praxis
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
19067 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

No, you are a liar


I challenge every current Republican who lives in the South to go back one generation. Eighty percent chance your dad was a democrat.
Go back two generations. 95% chance your grandfather was a democrat.

Southern Democrats ARE today's Republicans. Just because they believed in segregation doesn't make them evil, but it certainly doesn't make what I said a lie. You're either stupid, proud, or quite possible both.

Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22635 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

quote: I'd say they'd have their own party, you know since Republicans don't support segregation and voted overwhelmingly for civil rights This just tells me you don't "get" what I'm saying. Segregation and Civil Rights are not an issue. The old segregationist Dems would be Republicans today based on the same reason they favored segregation (small federal government and states' rights). Now that's not the only reason they favored segregation...many were of course "racists." I place quotes around racists because I do not believe it's fair to call someone who lived in the south in the 1870s a racist.

Not all republicans are for states rights or small govt. We have a "uniparty" now. There is no way to know what party Lincoln would be in today..that's why her statement is pointless. Perhaps his belief in God or simply decency would have kept him away from the godless, heaten filled Democratic Party..
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
19067 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

What in the hell do southern democrats living after Lincoln have to do with this teachers statements as perceived by my son?
First, calm down. Your son needs to hear opposing ideologies, however, it's too early for his teacher to say what she did.

To answer your question, the voters that comprise the parties have largely switched places.
Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5536 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:06 pm to
Sounds like a bunch of republicans ashamed of where the party evolved from.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

Segregationist Democrats back then are today's Republican


What are you basing that claim on?
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
19067 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Not all republicans are for states rights or small govt. We have a "uniparty" now. There is no way to know what party Lincoln would be in today..that's why her statement is pointless. Perhaps his belief in God or simply decency would have kept him away from the godless, heaten filled Democratic Party..
You don't think I know this? Pretend its 2004 before both parties went further to their extremities. Lots has changed (especially among dems in the last 10 years).
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
19067 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

What are you basing that claim on?

Just read please. I've got history papers to grade.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram