Started By
Message

re: Jimbo contract does not contain the lsu clause in his contract. it was removed

Posted on 9/29/16 at 1:53 am to
Posted by LSUTigerfaninHtown
President of the OT as of 5/26/11
Member since Nov 2008
24252 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 1:53 am to
quote:

My guess is that since DALSU is able to comment on Jimbo, that we aren't pursuing him. The fact that he cannot comment on Herman would indicate that something is going on and he can't talk about it. Just read between the lines...


Following that logic, Jimbo wasn't pursued last year either. That would certainly contradict what DALSU said at the time.
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
49498 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 2:00 am to
quote:

Following that logic, Jimbo wasn't pursued last year either. That would certainly contradict what DALSU said at the time.

They aren't mutually exclusive. It has to do with timing, but I don't know.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram