- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/29/16 at 1:51 pm to Pectus
quote:If you're guaranteeing ahead of time that there are 10,000,000 marbles in the bowl, theoretically counting either one would be equally correct. But from a more human perspective with margin of error, you'd obviously count the reds. I guess I'm confused as to why that's even a question though?
Setup: a bowl of 10,000,000 marbles. 1,000 red marbles, and 9,999,000 green marbles. Which is the more accurate way to get the makeup of the red marble count? Count all the green marbles? OR Count all the red marbles?
quote:Same as above. Relying on human error, it would seem obvious which is more likely to have errors, the one with the insanely higher volume.
Which, given counting error would be the most reliable method when there is likely error present?
Posted on 8/29/16 at 5:28 pm to shel311
quote:
If you're guaranteeing ahead of time that there are 10,000,000 marbles in the bowl, theoretically counting either one would be equally correct. But from a more human perspective with margin of error, you'd obviously count the reds. I guess I'm confused as to why that's even a question though?
Same as above. Relying on human error, it would seem obvious which is more likely to have errors, the one with the insanely higher volume.
Your answer explores the two ends of the problem the best.
In science, when neither parts are known you have to rely on instruments to do the counting, but there is also error involved in the instrumentation and lack of resolution of the instrumentation.
So when you are dealing with counting things on such a small scale, with those things being in such a larger, more concentrated medium, you have to ask which is more reliable?
Counting the thing that is in the least concentration, or counting the thing in greatest concentration and subtracting it from the whole to get the thing that is in the least concentration?
They both have error.
This isn't really a right or wrong problem, it is an exercise in being deliberate in choosing what/how to do science.
There is no concrete answer like most of the posters supplied. It doesn't matter if you know the concentration or not going in, you are still going to have error when those parts are physically counted.
If you use percents then your percentage needs to be to the same level of significance as your sample size. And if you are off by a fraction of a fraction, that affects marble counts on both the red or green sides.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 5:34 pm to Pectus
It is long-term thinking of this type that keeps you in hand lotion and internet porn.
I would likely pay some poorly compensated teacher to do the work for me.
I would likely pay some poorly compensated teacher to do the work for me.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 5:36 pm to Pectus
3. Pay a Mexican to count them for you.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 5:45 pm to Scruffy
Scruffy, you're a fellow science person!
Posted on 8/29/16 at 5:45 pm to LCA131
quote:
It is long-term thinking of this type that keeps you in hand lotion and internet porn.
This is not long-term thinking the is the initial stage of thinking!
Posted on 8/29/16 at 5:56 pm to Pectus
quote:
Your answer explores the two ends of the problem the best.
Then I say count the green ones because I have a better chance of determining my counting error. If there is a 0.01% chance I have a counting error, then I will not necessarily have a miscount with the reds. With the greens I will get several errors which will let me know the error in my counting algorithm.
TL;DR - do the one with more data points
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News