Started By
Message

re: LSU not ranked by ESPN as one of 8 "Blue-Blood" CFB Programs

Posted on 8/25/16 at 6:10 pm to
Posted by RightHook
Member since Dec 2013
5560 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 6:10 pm to
looks about right.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 6:12 pm to
LSU fans should feel flattered that we are in at 9. When you look at the traditions of the ones ahead of us, it's pretty powerful company. The fact that Alabama is in there ribs like a rock in my shoe but they have the numbers.
Posted by Panthera Tigris
Tampa Bay
Member since Jun 2007
650 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 6:34 pm to
I think a #9 ranking is appropriate. Immediately after reading the title of the thread, my reaction was that LSU was a solid top 15 , and I figured we'd be around #12. I kind of expected Penn State and FSU would be ahead of us. However, after looking at the list, I do not believe we belong in the top 8, but I can now certainly agree with a #9 ranking. FSU prior to Bobby Bowden was insignificant. The same can be said of Florida prior to Spurrier. Frankly , I had no idea PSU had only 2 national titles. What really helps us is Billy Cannon and the 1958 title.
Posted by JETigER
LSU 2011 National Champions
Member since Dec 2003
7081 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 6:57 pm to
Lsu is a top 10 program in football, a top 20 team in basketball and a top 5 in college baseball.

This means that lsu fans take a back seat to no one.

Posted by Haughtonboy
kansas
Member since Nov 2011
1753 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 7:13 pm to
Honestly happy to be at #9. Hard to argue the storied programs in front of us...

GEAUX Tigers!
Posted by Tigerdev
Member since Feb 2013
12287 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 7:47 pm to
We are more like ignant new money and I love it
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
49500 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 9:28 pm to
I think number 9 is a pretty good spot on this list...
Posted by SpookeyTiger
Williamsburg, MO
Member since Jan 2012
3537 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 9:50 pm to
I would agree with this assessment. #9 seems high to me but I'll take it.

Posted by luvlsufootball
Member since Apr 2014
945 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:16 pm to
I agree with it! Nebraska was a good selection. Football history is theme!
Posted by TheHat7
Member since Oct 2015
7189 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:32 pm to
I'm good with a top ten program. As long as we're staying in top ten them were competing for titles every few years and winning every now and then. We're due for another.. It happens this year.
Posted by STRIPES
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2003
4771 posts
Posted on 8/26/16 at 1:05 am to
I don't care. Really.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98745 posts
Posted on 8/26/16 at 2:37 am to
Nebraska is no longer relevant. Notre Dame is barely relevant after being completely irrelevant for 15 years or more. They're using bogus criteria. History matters, but it matters less than recent success. Titles won in the 2000's should carry more weight than titles won in the 1970's, which should carry more weight than titles won in the 1920's.

By their metric, Minnesota should be in the conversation. They were absolutely dominant before WWII. Hell, why not Yale?
Posted by Purple Berries
Atlanta
Member since Aug 2016
234 posts
Posted on 8/26/16 at 2:53 am to
Not going to read link yet just going to guess them, see how I do....These are the most traditional ones I can think of + FSU bc they cant be going on too much tradition if LSU is 9
Alabama
Ohio State
Michigan
Texas
Oklahoma
USC
Notre Dame
Florida State

Posted by Purple Berries
Atlanta
Member since Aug 2016
234 posts
Posted on 8/26/16 at 2:58 am to
When looking at that list, it is kind of strange to have LSU at 9. I didnt read the criteria, but after those 8, i dont LSU logically fits at 9. I would guess maybe Penn State as 9
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 8/26/16 at 8:35 am to
La Tech > Tulane..........
Posted by Lou the Jew from LSU
Member since Oct 2006
4741 posts
Posted on 8/26/16 at 1:45 pm to
Hey, we ain't blue blood in any way and I like it that way
Posted by Curtiselwood
NOLA - The Big Dirty
Member since Sep 2004
241 posts
Posted on 8/26/16 at 1:52 pm to
Dead on accurate,
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
67141 posts
Posted on 8/26/16 at 8:43 pm to
That's where LSU should be rated.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35634 posts
Posted on 8/26/16 at 8:53 pm to
To be ranked in the top ten of most important college football programs in history is pretty damn amazing.
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 8/26/16 at 9:06 pm to
I'd agree it's hard to argue with that ranking although, I think it's unfair to put so much emphasis on past success for other teams if you're going to focus on our perceived lack of success in the past while giving credit for our recent success and ignoring certain blue bloods lack of success as of late. The most glaring thing to me is one SEC school after the other throughout the rankings.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram