Started By
Message

re: Has Rotten Tomatoes jumped the shark?...

Posted on 7/16/16 at 8:10 am to
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 7/16/16 at 8:10 am to
People have generally liked the movie from what I've seen.



My point all along is I really wouldn't want to watch GB reboot even if they had cast men in those roles.
Posted by Addison Tiger
Antwerp, Belgium
Member since Jul 2005
644 posts
Posted on 7/16/16 at 8:35 am to
quote:

People have generally liked the movie from what I've seen.


Around half of the 78,000 audience reviews on rotten tomatoes disagree. I haven't seen the movie, so don't have an opinion, just curious about the discrepancies on rotten tomatoes and whether it's really accurate, or honest with it's scores.
Posted by Nix to Twillie
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2015
17911 posts
Posted on 7/16/16 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

My point all along is I really wouldn't want to watch GB reboot even if they had cast men in those roles.


Exactly. I think the backlash would have been just as strong had the movie starred Seth Rogen, Jay Baruchel, Jonah Hill and James Franco.
Posted by LSU Coyote
Member since Sep 2007
53390 posts
Posted on 7/16/16 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

My point all along is I really wouldn't want to watch GB reboot even if they had cast men in those roles.

It would take something away from my childhood. Change the feelings I have attached to those memories.

If it wasn't a GB3 with all original cast, I don't want another.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram