Started By
Message

re: EngineLabs LS vs Coyote

Posted on 6/22/16 at 12:25 pm to
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16722 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

They had a budget limit. It just costs more to build a Ford motor than an LS since the aftermarket for the LS is so much larger.


They also artificially rev limited the Coyote in that test. And no, the aftermarket for the Ford Mod motors is at least equal. The only parts available for the LS engines that the Mod motors don't typically get are heads and engine blocks but since they can make 2,000+ hp on factory castings there's no reasons for aftermarket supplied versions either. The Mustang has more aftermarket support than the Camaro does period too.

quote:

But, with equal displacement, a 4V motor would easily outdo a 2V. At what cost though?


Really depends on how much power one wants to make. The LSx is going to hit a wall before the Mod motor does, at which point the cost of custom parts will make the LSx more expensive. The LSx's used to have a practically insurmountable advantage in making power naturally aspirated but with the latest Mod motors, making a 600+ hp N/A Coyote isn't any more difficult now than ordering off-the-shelf parts and dyno tuning.
This post was edited on 6/22/16 at 12:27 pm
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11924 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

They also artificially rev limited the Coyote in that test.


I noticed that too. When they showed the power curve, it continued to climb past 7000 rpm.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram