- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hayes hearing in progress thread
Posted on 6/3/16 at 1:58 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 6/3/16 at 1:58 pm to Chad504boy
quote:Notice how I said in my story I think he is guilty of manslaughter? Did you read or just get angry and stop after the first sentence?
you don't get to show up with a gun and retaliate with someone who then feels the need to retrieve their gun due to you having your gun. That doesn't authorize you to shoot to kill in self defense.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 1:58 pm to Chad504boy
quote:I said GUESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS. I started off letting you know I will make assumptions
You, the one who rode the high horse on my assumptions, are making assumptions yourself
This post was edited on 6/3/16 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 6/3/16 at 1:59 pm to Chad504boy
quote:I dont need confirmation. I have seen a video of him
hell nobody even confirmed a shirtless man story today
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:00 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Notice how I said in my story I think he is guilty of manslaughter? Did you read or just get angry and stop after the first sentence?
i'm not angry.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:00 pm to jorconalx
quote:Notice where I said Hayes is guilty in my theory?
There are no lengths that some of these fools will go to justify what Hayes did. Big bad will smith got what he deserved in their opinions
Nope, just get mad
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:01 pm to Chad504boy
quote:Then what caused the incorrect assumption from you thinking I said he is allowed to do what he did? How did me saying he is guilty of manslaughter lead you to the conclusion that I think what he did is legal?
i'm not angry.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:01 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I said GUESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS. I started off letting you know I will make assumptions
quote:crawfishing thug lover.
They are drunk as shite as we know now.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:02 pm to lsupride87
quote:
incorrect assumption from you thinking I said he is allowed to do what he did?
did i say you said?
quote:did i say anything about what you said?
that I think what he did is legal?
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:03 pm to Chad504boy
quote:You responded to me saying, "That doesn't authorize you to shoot to kill in self defense."
did i say anything about what you said?
After I said he is guilty, I am clearly pointing out what he did does not authorize self defense. Why would you then respond to me saying it doesnt authorize self defense? Just admit you didnt read my whole post
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:13 pm to lsupride87
quote:
"That doesn't authorize you to shoot to kill in self defense."
so you incorrectly assumed "they" were drunk, you claimed me to have said something about what you said which i did not. You are becoming a habitual assumer in this thread. Quite disturbing.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:17 pm to Chad504boy
This is my last post to you, I apologize to the others in this thread for letting Chad get to me and muddy up the thread
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:25 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
"they"
no we don't.
im guessing the rest of the people hanging out with him were generally drinking. its a jump, but its not a big jump to assume most/all of the group is drinking when the driver blows a .24
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:28 pm to NoSaint
quote:
im guessing the rest of the people hanging out with him were generally drinking. its a jump, but its not a big jump to assume most/all of the group is drinking when the driver blows a .24
oh its a fairly safe assumption but he presented it as known "they" were drunk bc of will smith's bac. That's just not factually accurate.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:44 pm to Chad504boy
I had to step out for a little bit...
result of today's hearing...
Judge would not lower Hayes' $1.75M bond... and trial date is set for 9/20 and is expected to last about 2 weeks
result of today's hearing...
Judge would not lower Hayes' $1.75M bond... and trial date is set for 9/20 and is expected to last about 2 weeks
This post was edited on 6/3/16 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:52 pm to rt3
quote:
Chris Boudreaux ?@cbou1
@chickforet @coreygaudet Thanks for reports.Am I understanding this correctly, Haynes was punched 3-4times and then used gun n self defense?
quote:
Donald Chick Foret ?@chickforet 2m2 minutes ago
Donald Chick Foret Retweeted Chris Boudreaux
That is what defense attorneys are arguing. Prosecutors argue that there is no physical evidence of any injuries.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:57 pm to rt3
FYI, you generally can't get punched and then shoot someone and then argue self-defense.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 3:17 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
FYI, you generally can't get punched and then shoot someone and then argue self-defense.
![](https://rawreplaymedia.com/media/2013/1306/fox_zimmerman_laughs_130703a.jpg)
But I agree, generally speaking
Posted on 6/3/16 at 3:20 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I dont need confirmation. I have seen a video of him
I haven't seen this, can you post link?
Posted on 6/3/16 at 3:24 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:
I haven't seen this, can you post link?
yeah, all the people at the scene who testified today said they didn't see a shirtless dude
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)