- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Local Tv Revenue for MLB Teams
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:38 pm
Interesting article from fangraphs where they estimate how much tv revenue teams will get in 2016 and shows how long their current deals are locked in for and for how much.
LINK
LINK
2
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:46 pm to RyanL
Posted on 4/25/16 at 12:48 pm to knight_ryder
Ari is a lot higher than I would have guessed
Posted on 4/25/16 at 1:00 pm to Patton
Oakland higher than St. Louis is a bit surprising. I know STL is a relatively small market, but that's a hugely popular team in that market
Posted on 4/25/16 at 1:03 pm to RyanL
Atlanta and Washington must have real shitty deals.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 1:24 pm to Korin
quote:
Atlanta and Washington must have real shitty deals.
Not only is our(ATL) tv deal terrible, it is basically locked in until the end of time.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 1:34 pm to Patton
quote:
Ari is a lot higher than I would have guessed
Just signed a new deal. Fairly large market, 4 million plus people. They get good ratings locally as well.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:16 pm to AZBayouBengal07
happy to see the Astros near the top.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:17 pm to Korin
quote:
Atlanta and Washington must have real shitty deals.
The Baltimore/Washington TV deal is a really long, complicated, nasty story.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:32 pm to AZBayouBengal07
These local TV contracts have really increased in the last several years. ARI just signed a deal, so they benefited from the timing. MLB may not get great ratings nationally, but local TV markets are not struggling at all, unless the team is terrible.
I would like to know more details of the LAD deal. Something like 90% of the LA market do not get Dodgers games. Their provider doesn't carry the channel.
I would like to know more details of the LAD deal. Something like 90% of the LA market do not get Dodgers games. Their provider doesn't carry the channel.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:38 pm to Alt26
quote:
I know STL is a relatively small market, but that's a hugely popular team in that market
I can't read the link, but STL just signed a new agreement starting next year. It was for a pretty outrageous amount. Now that network (Fox Sports Midwest) has basically cut every employee not directly associated with a Cardinals or Blues broadcast.
They used to have these chicks that would do promotional and charity events for them and were featured on the commercials for future live game broadcasts. They cut them right after the new deal was signed. One of them works for CBS Sports now.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:56 pm to knight_ryder
Man the Royals have a shitty deal right now. 
Posted on 4/25/16 at 2:57 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
They used to have these chicks that would do promotional and charity events for them and were featured on the commercials for future live game broadcasts. They cut them right after the new deal was signed.
All the regional Fox Sports networks had chicks, and almost all of them were fired across the country. These networks exist to air local NBA, NHL or MLB games. They pay a ton of money for those games & nothing else on that channel creates ad revenue because no one watches anything else. FS Midwest wasn't the only regional network to layoff a bunch of employees, they all did.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 3:05 pm to Ghost of Colby
quote:
FS Midwest wasn't the only regional network to layoff a bunch of employees, they all did.
I was unaware that I somehow implied they were alone in that.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 3:28 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
Oakland higher than St. Louis is a bit surprising. I know STL is a relatively small market, but that's a hugely popular team in that market
That's the ending of their old deal
Singed a new deal for 1billion over the life of it. starts at 55mil for 1st season then heads to 85milish region.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 3:32 pm to Ghost of Colby
quote:we all would. we just dont really know too much about the specifics. we dont even know how much ownership the dodgers have in the network. its no longer 90% of the LA market without the network. i think its closer to 60% which is still really bad. there are a lot of rumors about how TWC is losing so much money over this because they obviously have to pay the dodgers what they agreed but they arent generating nearly as much money as they expected. TWC is in a really bad spot
I would like to know more details of the LAD deal. Something like 90% of the LA market do not get Dodgers games. Their provider doesn't carry the channel.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 3:37 pm to WestCoastAg
NL Central all bunched up towards the bottom. Good for Cubs and Cards(with new deal mentioned in thread)
Posted on 4/25/16 at 4:00 pm to ProjectP2294
Hmmm the nl central is overall pretty low ( for now)
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:34 pm to Vestigial Morgan
Yea so long carriers keep giving out mega deals the Cubs are going to make a mint come 2019
This post was edited on 4/25/16 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 4/25/16 at 8:59 pm to piggidyphish
will local networks be able to pay out that kind of money by 2019 with all of the cord cutting going on
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News