- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted on 5/31/16 at 4:38 pm to BenderIsGreat
Posted on 5/31/16 at 4:38 pm to BenderIsGreat
quote:
Basically, nurse practitioners think they are doctors and shouldn't have to practice with supervision. Doctors disagree.
Despite 27 states that have already agreed and passed bill in favor of the Nurses.
2
Posted on 5/31/16 at 4:38 pm to chadg
quote:
Not sure if serious...
Absolutely serious. They can already see patients. They just need a doctor to enter into a CPA with them. Again, I know of a few groups who do this for free.
quote:
Try and find a doctor that will move to rural Louisiana and treat a large amount of Medicaid patients...
1) Hi.
2) Please explain how Medicaid has anything to do with this. Nothing in the bill requires the NP to see Medicaid or more Medicaid than other. Medicaid isn't even mentioned. Perhaps you just mean that people in these areas are largely Medicaid. That's possibly true, depending on which area we are talking about.
3) Why do you think an NP is any more likely to do this than an MD? They can already be seeing patients in rural areas with a CPA. The removal of the CPA doesn't create more NPs.
4) if costs of CPAs were made $0 and the LSBME created a website by which physicians willing to be available at no charge for NPs willing to work in rural areas, would you be in favor of or against that?
Posted on 5/31/16 at 4:43 pm to Restomod
Man, this discussion always shows serious insecurity in some doctors. Relax, guys.
Eta: 7 doctors
Eta: 7 doctors
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 5/31/16 at 4:45 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
However, in times of war guess who provides the anesthetic for warriors in the battlefield?
I'll counter- in times of war we reverse triage and don't take care of the ones who are injured and are more likely to die. America isn't a war zone. I disagree with the transitive property in this scenario.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 4:48 pm to Restomod
If I threw enough piles of money at legislators, I could get states to declare Bender as the state mascot. Doesn't mean it's in the best interest of the state (which in my case, it always is).
Posted on 5/31/16 at 5:07 pm to Janky
quote:
Which one lowers my taxes and lets me keep my guns?
Neither because NPs are subject to the same "Obama coming to take your gun rules" that MD/DOs are, and there won't be any savings because of La corruption.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 5:17 pm to Janky
It's a scope of practice expansion - would let them function as an autonomous MD would
Posted on 5/31/16 at 5:18 pm to chadg
If u are for safety and education and prolife you oppose this bill
Posted on 5/31/16 at 5:19 pm to Hopeful Doc
quote:
n times of war we reverse triage and don't take care of the ones who are injured and are more likely to die. America isn't a war zone. I disagree with the transitive property in this scenario.
Regardless of who is getting surgery or why........who is delivering the anesthetic?
Military CRNA training sites are some of the most difficult and highly regarding training sites in the country. Have been before Anesthesiologist EVER existed pre World War II.
This post was edited on 5/31/16 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 5/31/16 at 5:20 pm to LATigerdoc
quote:
If u are for safety and education and prolife you oppose this bill
@ you peddling this as your opposition 
Posted on 5/31/16 at 5:38 pm to L S Usetheforce
Ummmm. Anesthesia was done by a doctor in Georgia in like the 1800s
Posted on 5/31/16 at 6:08 pm to Restomod
And if you are for more access to care, with lower prices, and no statistical difference in treatment outcome, vote for the bill. 
Well, until they pass legislation where they deserve same pay
Well, until they pass legislation where they deserve same pay
This post was edited on 5/31/16 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 5/31/16 at 6:18 pm to guttata
quote:
with lower prices,
Link?
Posted on 5/31/16 at 6:22 pm to guttata
quote:
no statistical difference in treatment outcome
Link me a study that's decent in design and adequately powered?
Posted on 5/31/16 at 6:27 pm to LATigerdoc
quote:
LATigerdoc
quote:
759 posts
They must all be in this thread. Is anything going to be covered on page 108 that wasn't covered ad nauseam in the first 2140 posts?
Posted on 5/31/16 at 6:40 pm to LATigerdoc
quote:
If u are for safety and education and prolife you oppose this bill
Here's hoping the legislature sees through the self serving bullshite this turd is spewing and passes this bill.
This post was edited on 5/31/16 at 6:43 pm
Posted on 5/31/16 at 6:41 pm to guttata
Near same cost
Worse outcomes - some quite dangerous
No significant change in access
Worse outcomes - some quite dangerous
No significant change in access
Posted on 5/31/16 at 6:42 pm to slackster
U missed 2014
Posted on 5/31/16 at 6:43 pm to Sayre
This is the last post today from me.
I
Am
Not
In
Primary
Care
I
Am
Not
In
Primary
Care
Posted on 5/31/16 at 6:44 pm to LATigerdoc
LINK
I'm sure I could come up with a better study, but this was one of ghd first things that popped up
I'm sure I could come up with a better study, but this was one of ghd first things that popped up
Page 107 of 127
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News