Started By
Message

re: Homeowner for the win

Posted on 3/14/16 at 9:50 am to
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16723 posts
Posted on 3/14/16 at 9:50 am to
quote:

The law is very clear they you are not (just because he broke in or stole stuff.


No, the law isn't. Maybe you should read some of those laws.

Some of you that think property isn't a good reason to use lethal force seem to forget that the criminal has already decided it's worth risking their life to get it. Carjacking is almost universally mentioned in CD and SYG laws.
Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5540 posts
Posted on 3/14/16 at 11:50 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/14/16 at 11:54 am
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31669 posts
Posted on 3/14/16 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Carjacking is almost universally mentioned in CD and SYG laws.


I'm talking about common law and typical self defense statutes, first of all. Carjacking typically involves threat with a weapon and the victim being Ina vulnerable position (in a car).

Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
135186 posts
Posted on 3/14/16 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Some of you that think property isn't a good reason to use lethal force seem to forget that the criminal has already decided it's worth risking their life to get it. Carjacking is almost universally mentioned in CD and SYG laws.

Carjacking implies that they are forcing entry into your vehicle while you're still in it.

You can't shoot someone walking down the street away from you with your TV.
This post was edited on 3/14/16 at 3:35 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram