- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Homeowner for the win
Posted on 3/14/16 at 9:50 am to baybeefeetz
Posted on 3/14/16 at 9:50 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
The law is very clear they you are not (just because he broke in or stole stuff.
No, the law isn't. Maybe you should read some of those laws.
Some of you that think property isn't a good reason to use lethal force seem to forget that the criminal has already decided it's worth risking their life to get it. Carjacking is almost universally mentioned in CD and SYG laws.
Posted on 3/14/16 at 11:50 am to Clames
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/14/16 at 11:54 am
Posted on 3/14/16 at 3:09 pm to Clames
quote:
Carjacking is almost universally mentioned in CD and SYG laws.
I'm talking about common law and typical self defense statutes, first of all. Carjacking typically involves threat with a weapon and the victim being Ina vulnerable position (in a car).
Posted on 3/14/16 at 3:29 pm to Clames
quote:
Some of you that think property isn't a good reason to use lethal force seem to forget that the criminal has already decided it's worth risking their life to get it. Carjacking is almost universally mentioned in CD and SYG laws.
Carjacking implies that they are forcing entry into your vehicle while you're still in it.
You can't shoot someone walking down the street away from you with your TV.
This post was edited on 3/14/16 at 3:35 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News