Started By
Message

re: U.S. tells Google computers can qualify as drivers

Posted on 2/9/16 at 7:43 pm to
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
90174 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

A car piloted by a 286 processor with a 40MB hard drive would be an improvement over 98% of Louisiana drivers.


The only problem, is that computers frick-up as well, they crash, and they can be hacked. In theory, it's a good idea. In practice, the verdict remains to be seen.
Posted by Kujo
225-911-5736
Member since Dec 2015
6015 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

The only problem, is that computers frick-up as well


not as much as the other option

quote:

they crash,


so far they've only been crashed into, by a non-computer

quote:

they can be hacked


this is a concern, but I believe that any car with onstar can be hacked right now.

quote:

Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely

More than 100 drivers in Austin, Texas found their cars disabled or the horns honking out of control, after an intruder ran amok in a web-based vehicle-immobilization system normally used to get the attention of consumers delinquent in their auto payments.


LINK /


so it wouldn't be a new developement
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
39067 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 7:52 pm to
quote:


The only problem, is that computers frick-up as well, they crash, and they can be hacked. In theory, it's a good idea. In practice, the verdict remains to be seen.


Google's cars haven't caused any crashes yet, and they have driven millions of miles. All of the accidents were caused by a human driver.
This post was edited on 2/9/16 at 7:53 pm
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49539 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

The only problem, is that computers frick-up as well, they crash


Your laptop doesn't have nearly the failsafes that will be required of self-driving cars. Plus all of the software that you install on your PC has a big affect on crashes. I think that I'm a well above average driver (though I figure most people think of themselves that way). I don't text and drive. I use my blinkers all of the time. I always obey the 2 second rule when behind another driver. I still trust computers to drive better than I can. By a wide margin. I can't wait for self driving cars, assuming that the Fedgov allows drunkards to use them. Unfortunately, I suspect that bullshite rules will be implemented to protect police departments that rely on DUIs as well as the cab unions/Ubers of the world.

I do agree that hacks could frick shite up. But all new cars have computers as is, so I don't think that's much of a change.
This post was edited on 2/9/16 at 7:54 pm
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28700 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

In practice, the verdict remains to be seen.


Computers are far superior to their human counterparts, even now.

The problem, as you've correctly noted, is the stupid humans still on the roads.

Even autonomous cars will still be in crashes, until all cars are autonomous.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28700 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 8:44 pm to
I also have a theory that the more money you make, the less you're involved in crashes.

I have no way to quantify this, though.

Lower IQ is a given.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram