- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jerricho Cotchery's catch ruled incomplete after review - explanation?
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:45 am to LSU Piston
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:45 am to LSU Piston
I thought it was a catch until Mike Carey said that he thought it was a catch. Then at that point I knew it was going to stand
1
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:46 am to barry
quote:
Its like porn, you can't define it but you know when you see it
I get that, and that used to be my theory on it, but each person has a different definition. I think the sport owes it to its players to define it. You have heard them complain what is or is not control. The sport owes us, the fans nothing.
I did not care if it was a catch a non catch, I would just like to know what those are again.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:47 am to Patrick_Bateman
Posted by Geauxgurt on 2/8/16 at 10:46 am to LSU Piston
You mean the obvious incompletion where the ball hits the ground, moves and then he regains control?
Some people really are blind.
This right here. When he rolls over the ball is moving then he gains possession. I don't know what everyone else is seeing how do you not see that.
You mean the obvious incompletion where the ball hits the ground, moves and then he regains control?
Some people really are blind.
This right here. When he rolls over the ball is moving then he gains possession. I don't know what everyone else is seeing how do you not see that.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:48 am to sms151t
quote:
I think the sport owes it to its players to define it.
This sounds like a lawyers wet dream.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:50 am to barry
I am waiting for SFP to come in here so he can help, so legalese may bait him to show up
But seriously, I just wished it would be more consistent from crew to crew and that is why I think they need to come up with a definition.
But seriously, I just wished it would be more consistent from crew to crew and that is why I think they need to come up with a definition.
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 11:52 am
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:51 am to LL012697
Hahaha. That type of play they have been calling incomplete all year, get over it, pass was incomplete.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:53 am to sms151t
quote:
But seriously, I just wished it would be more consistent from crew to crew and that is why I think they need to come up with a definition.
I'd like to think the NFL has a video library of examples of catch v no catches to demonstrate.
Also this is another reason why a central review location would be best. You would have only a small handful of guys making calls. It would be consistent.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:57 am to barry
Ball touches ground, starts to move towards his side and back. Ground caused movement, incomplete.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:59 am to Geauxgurt
quote:It only took 3 post too settle this.
You mean the obvious incompletion where the ball hits the ground, moves and then he regains control?
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News