Anyone who hated on the BCS was a complete idiot. It is by far the best way to rank and compare teams that play totally different schedules.

The plus 1 model in the BCS would have been perfect. 4 is the perfect number, but the committee was a ridiculous decision that is mainly to ensure that there will continue to be controversy so they can eventually expand to 8.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Penrod

Member since Jan 2011

39927 posts

Posted on 10/19/15 at 3:46 pm to Tiger Voodoo

quote:
Anyone who hated on the BCS was a complete idiot. It is by far the best way to rank and compare teams that play totally different schedules. The plus 1 model in the BCS would have been perfect. 4 is the perfect number, but the committee was a ridiculous decision that is mainly to ensure that there will continue to be controversy so they can eventually expand to 8.

An unhealthy situation was emerging as a result of the BCS. SEC teams were dominating. It was fair, but it was not good for the game. The committee is a better, albeit less fair, solution. Shitty teams from popular northeast, midwest, and western locales, which play weak competition, were being eliminated by the BCS. Now they'll get in the tournament and get waxed. It'll bring in more fans and more money.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by AlxTgr

Kyre Banorg

Member since Oct 2003

81783 posts

Posted on 10/19/15 at 3:51 pm to Tiger Voodoo

quote:
Anyone who hated on the BCS was a complete idiot. It is by far the best way to rank and compare teams that play totally different schedules.

The plus 1 model in the BCS would have been perfect. 4 is the perfect number, but the committee was a ridiculous decision that is mainly to ensure that there will continue to be controversy so they can eventually expand to 8.