Glock 43 vs Kahr cm9 experience.

If those are the choices, I would go with the Kahr. They just do those types of guns better - at the end of the day, the Glock is still going to be a smallish brick.

I find that Glock scaling down does not present the same advantages in weight and ease of carry that their larger offerings do. And to be fair, I haven't shot the Glock single stack, yet, but I've held a few. The Kahr has trigger issues, but if I were getting a gun in that category, I'd probably get the Kahr, although I'd probably kick up to the PM9. Either way, I would probably do something to the trigger, which is the only real knock on the Kahrs.

I own the CM9 and it's about as small as I would want to go in a 9MM. The trigger is a little long, however it's really smooth. I actually don't mind a longer trigger when it comes to smaller guns. It's a safety issue. I believe Bapple has a video on YouTube with either a CM9 or PM9. Also, take a look at the Ruger LC9s. That new trigger is awesome.

Thanks all.