Started By
Message

re: U.S. considering using force to protect Syrian rebels hit by Russia

Posted on 10/2/15 at 9:30 am to
Posted by El Magnifico
La casa de tu mamá
Member since Jan 2014
7017 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 9:30 am to
The U.S. is seen by the world as the country that has caused this catastrophe in the Middle East. From Iraq to Libya to this, we have empowered the Islamists and destabilized the entire region causing massacres and desecrations from those animals. And for what? So the Saudis and Turks can have a stranglehold on the region in exchange for favorable energy policies (petrodollar)? People bitch about Iran and they are bad, but the Saudis are worse. We shouldn't be in bed with any of them. What happened to the American tradition of non-interventionism?
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 9:32 am to
quote:

People bitch about Iran and they are bad, but the Saudis are worse. We shouldn't be in bed with any of them. What happened to the American tradition of non-interventionism?


And you can point to the US for a lot of our current issues with Iran. We fricked that one up
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79414 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 9:32 am to
quote:

What happened to the American tradition of non-interventionism?


It died about 50-75 years ago.

But I don't see how we're supporting terrorists?
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17565 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 9:36 am to
quote:

What happened to the American tradition of non-interventionism?


Maybe ask Europeans who were alive in the 1930's or maybe even those who lived in China, Korea, etc. in the '30s also?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram