- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Update: Wilco Indiana show back on
Posted on 4/1/15 at 11:52 am to Baloo
Posted on 4/1/15 at 11:52 am to Baloo
A) I don't really care about your preferences. This is a music and politics discussion in a single thread that bridges two topics.
B) My interpretation isn't wrong. I stated that Indiana passed a law passed by other states. It's an RFRA. This is objectively accurate.
Furthermore, the idea that it isn't novel is also correct, unless you're relying on the concept that the statute's private suit defense is distinct (it is, but it's already been read in to other RFRA's through Court decisions and is therefore far from novel).
C) Irrelevant to anything I said. Whether a boycott is ineffective or not doesn't render Wilco's decision any less childish or ill informed.
D) See C)
E) Endorsed without exception
B) My interpretation isn't wrong. I stated that Indiana passed a law passed by other states. It's an RFRA. This is objectively accurate.
Furthermore, the idea that it isn't novel is also correct, unless you're relying on the concept that the statute's private suit defense is distinct (it is, but it's already been read in to other RFRA's through Court decisions and is therefore far from novel).
C) Irrelevant to anything I said. Whether a boycott is ineffective or not doesn't render Wilco's decision any less childish or ill informed.
D) See C)
E) Endorsed without exception
2
Posted on 4/1/15 at 12:53 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I stated that Indiana passed a law passed by other states. It's an RFRA. This is objectively accurate.
well, it's actually not because while indiana passed the RFRA law, it does have it's differences.
also my opinion is that if wilco really wanted to make a statement, do the show and donate the proceeds to LGBT organizations or something beneficial. make a real statement.
the boycott to me just seems so "the terrorists have won!"-ish
This post was edited on 4/1/15 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 4/1/15 at 1:10 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
A) I don't really care about your preferences. This is a music and politics discussion in a single thread that bridges two topics.
B) My interpretation isn't wrong. I stated that Indiana passed a law passed by other states. It's an RFRA. This is objectively accurate.
Furthermore, the idea that it isn't novel is also correct, unless you're relying on the concept that the statute's private suit defense is distinct (it is, but it's already been read in to other RFRA's through Court decisions and is therefore far from novel).
C) Irrelevant to anything I said. Whether a boycott is ineffective or not doesn't render Wilco's decision any less childish or ill informed.
D) See C)
E) Endorsed without exception
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News