- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cal's is 21-3 in the NCAA Tourney coaching UK (edited)
Posted on 3/27/15 at 12:27 am to Sellecks Moustache
Posted on 3/27/15 at 12:27 am to Sellecks Moustache
Take the names out of the equation for the sake of argument.
Which is better or perhaps less embarrassing:
To be a mediocre/decent team and lose to a bad team on the road or to be a great/very good team and lose to a mediocre team on a neutral court?
Personally I think both are terrible but the fact that Duke has done it twice in recent memory might be the trump card.
Which is better or perhaps less embarrassing:
To be a mediocre/decent team and lose to a bad team on the road or to be a great/very good team and lose to a mediocre team on a neutral court?
Personally I think both are terrible but the fact that Duke has done it twice in recent memory might be the trump card.
1
Posted on 3/27/15 at 7:48 am to HerbTyler985
quote:
a great/very good team and lose to a mediocre team on a neutral court?
Wait, sorry, which of those Duke teams was great or even very good? No one mistook them for very good teams. Not even Duke teams. They shouldn't have lost those games, but those weren't 'great' teams, give me a break.
Unless i'm not understanding your analogy.
This post was edited on 3/27/15 at 7:51 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News