Started By
Message

re: Legaility question regarding selling a house for more than its worth

Posted on 3/8/15 at 7:12 am to
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
16132 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 7:12 am to
It sounds like your conscience is trying to tell you something.

Just because something is "legal" does not mean it is right, just, moral or ethical.


Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 10:35 am to
quote:

It sounds like your conscience is trying to tell you something. Just because something is "legal" does not mean it is right, just, moral or ethical.
Wait just a minute. The seller doesn't need to know why a buyer places a higher value on an item than the seller does. Suppose the buyer wants the home because it contains a specific material he wants to remove and use for another project and the home is the only readily available source? Suppose the home sits on a piece of land adjacent to other property owned by the buyer, and the buyer is willing to pay a premium to obtain it? There is nothing wrong, unjust, immoral or unethical in accepting the best price offered if the seller is unaware of any defect in the property being sold that he has not disclosed to the buyer.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71702 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Just because something is "legal" does not mean it is right, just, moral or ethical.



bullshite. Nothing is stopping the uninformed consumer from becoming informed. Hell, I can research an entire town's worth of apartments and potential houses on my laptop without leaving my bed.

Ignorance is not an excuse.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram