- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Time will bear witness that Cole Kelley is....
Posted on 3/6/15 at 8:30 am to GeeOH
Posted on 3/6/15 at 8:30 am to GeeOH
quote:
If the guy would commit, it would make us lose the in state guy.
it has been rumored that they are not allowed to commit unless they come to camp, the offer is solely to get them to come to camp
I don't know if that is true or not
quote:
it's that I'm an LSU guy who wants Les to do what he preaches and take our instate guys over ios guys he's never seen play
and what if Les has seen the instate guy and doesn't think he is LSU material?
0
Posted on 3/6/15 at 8:31 am to GeeOH
quote:
there is equally impressive in state talent.
Equal to who? You? Because each kid has the same number of stars next to his name? By websites that are in the business to make money, not scout for college coaches?
Do you need it spelled out to you?
Posted on 3/6/15 at 9:16 am to RATeamWannabe
quote:
Because each kid has the same number of stars next to his name? By websites that are in the business to make money, not scout for college coaches?
So you think we recruit and offer a guy from oos that hasn't camped if he wouldn't be a highly rated prospect?
Ok big guy, I'll let you have the floor. How many qbs from oos that haven't camped that were not rated has LSU offered in the last 10 years?
Or
Is what you're saying that Kelly doesn't deserve 4 * rating?
My pint is, I would think they are closely talented. And since the stag has signed the higher rated guy, why not offer the scholly to an instate guy.
I want the more talented players at LSU and I def understand your thoughts.
But I don't want to hear a childish coach tell kids to go to hell for leaving the state at the same time treating in state kids like they don't deserve respect over oos players of equal talent.
Posted on 3/6/15 at 9:29 am to GeeOH
quote:
treating in state kids like they don't deserve respect over oos players of equal talent.
"equal" talent
do the coaches think they are equal talent?
Posted on 3/6/15 at 9:42 am to GeeOH
You are, wrongly, assuming that the oos and Louisiana kids have equal talent. It's simply that the coaches think that the oos guys are more talented or fit our schemes better. Not sure why this is so hard for you to understand.
Posted on 3/6/15 at 10:03 am to Salmon
quote:
do the coaches think they are equal talent?
You tell me, he doesn't have a committable offer? Or does he? If not, the THEY don't think he's more talented themselves.
Have they extended the same come-to-camp offer to in state guys?
Posted on 3/6/15 at 10:06 am to GeeOH
quote:
GeeOH
Easily the most irritating poster on here.
Posted on 3/6/15 at 10:46 am to LSU Patrick
Franks is better than both Patterson and Kelley. It's not even close.
Posted on 3/6/15 at 11:17 am to djkevlar
Kelley isn't close to Franks or Patterson. He's got a decent arm and is mobile but doesn't have a very quick release. He'll make someone a decent QB but I don't think he would ever play at LSU.
Posted on 3/6/15 at 11:38 am to tigertracts
Mr Kelly??
Posted on 3/6/15 at 1:24 pm to SL Tiger
Typical lafayette attitude thinking he's the best. I would understand an offer to him. But with discipline issues and a cement lower body I'm not sure his arm can override those issues.
Posted on 3/6/15 at 3:12 pm to GeeOH
quote:
GeeOH
My thinking all along is that they want to get all these guys to camp to see which one they prefer best. Offering Kelley now without seeing him in a setting against other top guys doesn't give you anything. Seeing what he can do in competition to Peters, Guarantano, Haskins, etc will give Cam a much better look at the situation. It also let's you see how these guys operate in person. He can get a more complete answer this way.
So I like what they have done. Get all these guys here to the big event and see which one you like best, then pour everything into getting him to commit.
This post was edited on 3/6/15 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 3/6/15 at 11:50 pm to Datbayoubengal
Haskins is the highest remaining on the board. Kelley can make a push at camp. It happens every year that a guy crushes the camp and gets an offer. I don't see Kelley as a top 10 qb nationally, but he's a solid prospect.
Posted on 3/7/15 at 10:20 am to Datbayoubengal
Exactly.... I'm just thrilled we have all these guys looking at LSU with Brandon Harris, Franks, and a Haskins, Kelly, Guarantano behind these guys, LSU is set up for some great football for years. Love the problem. This and the fact that we haven't had the best results lately shows you the recruiter Cam is and his name carries a lot of weight. Just think once one of these guys start producing and we have a QB theowing for 30 TDs a year??? With the backfield we have, my goodness?!?!
Posted on 3/9/15 at 9:43 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Kelley isn't close to Franks or Patterson. He's got a decent arm and is mobile but doesn't have a very quick release. He'll make someone a decent QB but I don't think he would ever play at LSU.
Clearly you have not watched any tape on either of the quarterbacks you are talking about. Franks is a good quarterback no doubt however he has a long windup style release while kelly is quick release and has above average arm strength. Also, i will say it again why does everyone feel the need that we have a mobil quarterback? The best offense we had was with Mett (no mobility like Cole) but please lets continue this trend of a mediocre "mobile" qb
Ignorance is a disease
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News