- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mike and Mike posed an interesting question
Posted on 3/10/15 at 2:06 pm to WarhawkRebel
Posted on 3/10/15 at 2:06 pm to WarhawkRebel
I haven't read all the posts in this thread, but I browsed through a few pages. I would be willing to bet that the yeses can be categorized generally as young and that those who said 'no, they wouldn't risk it,' can be categorized as older. I'm not sure what the over/under cut off is. Maybe it's 35, maybe it's 40--but I'd be willing to bet it's less than 50.
Am I right posters above?
Am I right posters above?
2
Posted on 3/10/15 at 2:07 pm to wrlakers
I said I'd do it. Married with two kids.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 3:04 pm to wrlakers
quote:Well if you were basing it on the expected value of the wins - expected value of losses, the we would expect a negative relationship between age and willingness to participate. I would argue that, mathematically, unless it is nearly impossible to make a half court shot, that the vast majority of the time, the value of expected pay-out would exceed the losses.
Am I right posters above?
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 3:07 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News