- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:34 pm to L S Usetheforce
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:34 pm to L S Usetheforce
Well, he is not the best DC in the country, but he's a very good 1. Lot's of criticism thrown his way now, and that's fine, but I wouldn't be surprised if A&M becomes a very good defensive team in the next couple of years, at least by year 3.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:34 pm to southeasttiger113
quote:
Chavis isn't one of the best DC's in the country go look up his stats in 2013 when the defensive talent wasn't out of this world and tell me more about how great he is
I have a better idea how about I look up his stats from his 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2014 season.
5>1.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:35 pm to lsu2006
quote:
You obviously aren't able to put aside your Chavis butthurt and look at things in a calm, reasonable manner.
Nah let Steele do that shite and I'm gonna say the same thing.
quote:
We don't even sniff victory over Alabama last year without that whale of a performance by our defense.
We don't. Yet we also don't win the game because Chavis let Bama punk him in the end, AGAIN.
This post was edited on 3/1/15 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:36 pm to lsu2006
quote:
So we're gonna put the Bama game on the defense? The same defense that held them to 13 points and less than 200 yards in regulation? Really?
No doubt that was a team loss, but Bama knew exactly what Chavis was going to do on the FG drive and ran it to perfection. I don't put the ultimate blame Chavis for the loss, at all. But stating that having to stop the #1 team in the nation on it's final drive was an "unnecessary strain", frick him and the horse he rode off on.
Actually I think that is probably a mis-characterization of what he said. Winners don't make statements like that.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:36 pm to gene_parmesan
The stats from when he had Peterson, mathieu, Claiborne, Reid, etc? He was blessed with possibly the most consistently talented run of defenses in NCAA history. There are literally hundreds of coordinators that could've done what he did with some of the best defensive backfields ever assembled. Sorry that you're apparently a complete dumbass and can't grasp that concept
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:38 pm to gene_parmesan
quote:
the defense was on the field because the offense turned it over. if the defense is having to be on the field because the offense turns it over, then the defense becomes tired. you say "don't give you the D tired", but I don't know how this isn't so obvious
Two of those drives combined to go 14 plays and 5 minutes total. If the D gets the 3 and out they should have on OM's game winning drive TOP likely ends up 30/30.
This post was edited on 3/1/15 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:42 pm to gene_parmesan
quote:
gene_parmesan
Chavis fanboy?
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:42 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
Chavis fanboy?
The guy who has to eat with a feeding tube because Les' nuts are lodged in his throat is calling someone else a fanboy?
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:42 pm to gene_parmesan
quote:
like I said, this isn't that hard.
it's isn't that hard, go dig into the drive chart for that game and you'll see that you're largely wrong on the "tired" angle.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:43 pm to southeasttiger113
quote:
The stats from when he had Peterson, mathieu, Claiborne, Reid, etc? He was blessed with possibly the most consistently talented run of defenses in NCAA history.
so how do you explain having the #1 defense in the conference last year?
quote:
complete dumbass
go buy a mirror. then, look in it.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:45 pm to lsu2006
quote:
The guy who has to eat with a feeding tube because Les' nuts are lodged in his throat is calling someone else a fanboy?
The frick is wrong with you?
You sound like dukke v.
Go frick yourself. I've never had a problem with you.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:45 pm to BeeFense5
as lsu2006 said
pot.kettle.black
and yeah, Miles should probably be a Chavis fanboy too. he prob wouldn't be employed here still if it wasn't for Chavis' defense bearing the weight of those downright atrocious offenses.
pot.kettle.black
and yeah, Miles should probably be a Chavis fanboy too. he prob wouldn't be employed here still if it wasn't for Chavis' defense bearing the weight of those downright atrocious offenses.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:46 pm to gene_parmesan
quote:
he prob wouldn't be employed here
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:46 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
Go frick yourself. I've never had a problem with you.
You've broken my e-heart :(
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:47 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
He felt concern that Miles may be on the way out and wanted job security
bullshite.....he wanted a years guaranteed salary regardless if he was working or not at LSU---it wasn't about "job security". The "clause" was not outrageous, and Aleva made the right decision.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:49 pm to gene_parmesan
Because LSU is still insanely talented compared to every other team in the SEC except maybe Bama, and there's that TOP thing that I mentioned earlier that usually leads to statistically strong defenses. Hopefully you're just trolling and you're not legitimately this clueless
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:49 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
go dig into the drive chart for that game
14:04 1 04:37 LSU 20 8 38 Punt
08:08 1 00:07 LSU 38 1 0 Interception
01:23 1 02:04 LSU 23 5 33 Punt
12:14 2 04:38 LSU 11 11 69 Interception
04:37 2 01:43 LSU 14 5 33 Interception
15:00 3 01:39 LSU 18 3 3 Punt
good thing our defense was able to keep it to only being down 10-0 after 3 first half turnovers.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:53 pm to gene_parmesan
LSU has had great defenses since 1936. Long before ChieF WAS BORN.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:53 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
He felt that his defense was under unnecessary strain because of the Tigers' offensive inconsistency.
Hes got a point... But it's an incredible cowardly thing to say.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:53 pm to gene_parmesan
quote:
good thing our defense was able to keep it to only being down 10-0 after 3 first half turnovers.
absolutely, but there was nothing about the first half turnovers that should have rendered the defense "overworked" for the second half when LSU's O scored 24 points. Maybe the offense scoring that much in the 2nd half put an "unnecessary strain" on the defense which caused them to give up the 14 play drive at the end for OM's game winning FG.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News