- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
gene_parmesan
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 247 |
| Registered on: | 1/12/2014 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Grateful Dead + Hornsby and Anastasio in Chicago & Santa Clara
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/4/15 at 12:13 pm to CaptainPanic
What would a chubby 14 year old from bama know about ketamine?
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/4/15 at 12:05 pm to chilge1
I have no idea what you are responding to, so I'll assume its the 6 times in 6 seasons line. first, 6 times is using the games yall believe the defense blew. I disagree with that number. I will concede that the bama 2012 game, and the UGA 2013 game is on the defense. so really, its more like twice. so really, its more like once every three seasons. not really that bad at all.
secondly, I still, in 16 pages, have not gotten an answer as to why our defense is expected to get a 3 and out every possession, but no one "expects" our offense to score every drive.
if you are going to sit here and say that a defense should stop the opposing offense, every time, then why is it that the offense is not expected to score everytime, regardless of how bad the defense is playing (which, a reminder, was very rare)?
secondly, I still, in 16 pages, have not gotten an answer as to why our defense is expected to get a 3 and out every possession, but no one "expects" our offense to score every drive.
if you are going to sit here and say that a defense should stop the opposing offense, every time, then why is it that the offense is not expected to score everytime, regardless of how bad the defense is playing (which, a reminder, was very rare)?
re: Grateful Dead + Hornsby and Anastasio in Chicago & Santa Clara
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/4/15 at 11:46 am to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
Selling tix on internet for above face doesn't take some sort of toughness or mental fortitude.
then why haven't you done it yet? you've had those tickets for what, 4 days now?
re: Grateful Dead + Hornsby and Anastasio in Chicago & Santa Clara
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/4/15 at 10:50 am to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
(2) Behind the stage passes went for 2500 on eBay yesterday
I am well aware of how much they are selling for. But you are going to go bc you are too much of a babyback bitch to be a scalper.
re: Grateful Dead + Hornsby and Anastasio in Chicago & Santa Clara
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/4/15 at 10:38 am to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
I'm gonna sell my tix for 3500 and rage lot and late night only
no you're not. have fun being surrounded by trustafarians and burnouts watching bobby struggle to play guitar, mickey and bill try to play over each other, and phil cackle into the mic.
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/4/15 at 10:33 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
Failure is never acceptable.
oh
the
ironing
tell
that
to
our
offense
quote:
I think he wanted larger leads so that he wouldn't have to defend a lead late in the game and get exposed, which he repeatedly did.
um repeatedly, as in 6 times in 6 seasons?
re: Grateful Dead + Hornsby and Anastasio in Chicago & Santa Clara
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/4/15 at 10:31 am to CaptainPanic
captain ****
more shows will be played
JAH will provide
more shows will be played
JAH will provide
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/4/15 at 10:28 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:
You can't tell me Synder was So bad he couldn't field a D that ranked under triple digits in team stats.......that's fricking crap.
I am telling you, right now, aTms defense was bad because of coaching.
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/4/15 at 10:27 am to chilge1
quote:
I doubt it. As I said earlier, I think it's more likely that the AD is more or less letting Sumlin hang himself by hiring Chavis. If he can't win with a proven DC, he's not going to win.
hey cool, we agree on something.
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/4/15 at 10:26 am to Dlab2013
quote:
Bamas D actually got worse when Kiffen arrived and got away from the run game.
no it got worse because they had a mediocre secondary.
re: Chavis deceptive departure to Texas A&M "screams NCAA rules violation"
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/3/15 at 10:34 am to white_mj
quote:
The courts are going to destroy Chavis and A&M.
quote:
Im not a law student or anything,
oh
the
ironing
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/3/15 at 10:29 am to DBU
quote:
And how many of those top-recruits are on defense?
google, how does it work?
LINK
LINK
LINK
were you trying to infer that Sumlin, being an offensive mind, would only recruit highly ranked offensive players, and then sort of cobble together some scrubs on defense? I mean, I know he hasn't beaten LSU, but give the man some credit.
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/3/15 at 10:17 am to Tigerinthehollow
"The issues is that his D will see similar number of snaps on the field do to the amount of time that gets run off the clock when the O goes three incompletions and 11 seconds run off the clock."
I know after last year watching LSUs passing game that its easy to assume that a QB can't complete passes, but a&m's passing offense is just a tad more coherent than LSUs.
I keep seeing this, as if aTm doesn't have talent. I am not sure where all these LSU posters are getting this impression that aTm doesn't have any talent.
LINK
While there is no denying that LSU had an embarrassment of riches in terms of talent, its not as if Chavis has gone off to Western Connecticut State. aTm is in the top 10 over a 4 year average, and they have only been trending up ever since Sumlin's arrival.
I know after last year watching LSUs passing game that its easy to assume that a QB can't complete passes, but a&m's passing offense is just a tad more coherent than LSUs.
quote:
Let's see what he can do without that advantage and without that talent. Time will tell.
I keep seeing this, as if aTm doesn't have talent. I am not sure where all these LSU posters are getting this impression that aTm doesn't have any talent.
LINK
While there is no denying that LSU had an embarrassment of riches in terms of talent, its not as if Chavis has gone off to Western Connecticut State. aTm is in the top 10 over a 4 year average, and they have only been trending up ever since Sumlin's arrival.
re: (Offseason thread) How does LSU's football facilities stack up
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/2/15 at 6:26 pm to Yaboylsu63
I'd say easily top 20, possibly higher.
Serious LOL @ anyone saying UF. They dont even have an IPF
Serious LOL @ anyone saying UF. They dont even have an IPF
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/2/15 at 2:51 pm to DBU
quote:
Bama gets the best recruits in the entire COUNTRY.
and the level of competition which bama goes up against is better than the level of competition than VT and clemson face. relativity, how does it work?
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/2/15 at 2:50 pm to JaxTiger10
quote:
I guess you missed the rest of that article where it showed how lsu was horrible in sacks and tfl.
yeah...in 2014. again, you keep wanting to use one year, instead of looking at chavis' entire body of work.
funny how that argument of using "the whole body of work" works when people want to defend Les and cite his 102-26 or whatever record in 10 seasons, but it doesnt work when trying to defend Chavis because, BAMA.
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/2/15 at 2:47 pm to JaxTiger10
quote:
If that's true lsu's offenses were above average in offensive points per game in all but 1 season during chavis' tenure.
LINK
2014- 76
2013- 23
2012- 57
2011- 17
2010- 45
2009- 76
2008- 30
so 2 years, below average, 4 years above average, the highest being 17, meaning that the 2013, using your own words, wasnt even the highest rated offense using your own metric. of course, that can be explained by the fact that the 2011 defense and special teams contributed greatly to scoring themselves, or putting the offense in a position to score easily. so, maybe (gasp!) points per game ISN'T that good of a metric to use.
quote:
You said an lsu offense where the qb almost broke the lsu passing record , JHill had the 2nd best rushing season in the history of the program, and 2 1000 yard wrs was just ok.
I also said that, while the 2013 offense may be good BY LSUS STANDARDS (since you are citing LSU records they broke) it was 35th in the country and 6th in the SEC, both of which are backed by facts.
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/2/15 at 2:38 pm to DBU
quote:
Please. Give either of them the talent that Bama is bringing in, year in/year out, and they would be ridiculous.
you act as if VT and clemson are bringing in scrubs. comparatively speaking, clemson gets the best recruits in the ACC at schools not named FSU and VT is 4th in the ACC.
look, don't take my word for it that the defense was really really good, take it from someone who is a little more objective.
LINK
"For the last five years, defense has been the main constant in LSU's success. We just expect it. Maybe even take it for granted a little."
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/2/15 at 2:25 pm to DBU
no
no
not a DC anymore
eh, 1a and 1b.
no
not a DC anymore
eh, 1a and 1b.
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/2/15 at 2:19 pm to JaxTiger10
quote:
2013 offense is the offense in question
no. YOU are the one making it about 2013s offense because you have no other leg to stand on. LSUs offense was pathetic in 5 of the 6 years chavis was here. that was my whole point. that was Chavis' whole point. I did not derail this thread, I am merely addressing all the morons who keep saying that Chavis' criticism of LSUs offense is unfounded or a "weak excuse".
did Chavis' defense blow it a couple of times? yes. does that mean he is not a very good DC? for some of you, apparently it does. I simply disagree and am still trying to figure out why LSU would let such a quality DC simply walk away to a division rival.
re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?
Posted by gene_parmesan on 3/2/15 at 2:01 pm to DBU
quote:
Yet another offering of your stupidity
name me a better one. or are you just butthurt that LSU got the guy he replaced as DC, instead of getting smart? its cool, just next time remember not to believe jim kleinpeter.
Popular
2












