- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Jinx- new HBO miniseries
Posted on 3/16/15 at 4:42 pm to SwaggerCopter
Posted on 3/16/15 at 4:42 pm to SwaggerCopter
How did the Jarecki screw him?
1
Posted on 3/16/15 at 4:45 pm to northLAgoomba
I supposed that the defense is going to argue that he can't get a fair trial because of the show.
The dude is either stupid for doing this interview or he has balls of steel and really thinks that he is THAT good that he can sit there and lie and get away with it.
The dude is either stupid for doing this interview or he has balls of steel and really thinks that he is THAT good that he can sit there and lie and get away with it.
This post was edited on 3/16/15 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 3/16/15 at 4:45 pm to tylercsbn9
quote:
I couldn't help but laugh at that stupid arse juror that thought he was innocent of all three. They were just framing this poor old man.
I'm just going to assume that whole jury got paid off.
When they first talked to that guy he said there was never more than 2 or 3 guilty votes while they deliberated. No way people are that stupid without getting paid.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 4:46 pm to cwill
quote:
How did the Jarecki screw him?
Um...the whole letter thing, for one.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 4:52 pm to lsuwontonwrap
quote:He is stupid for participating in the series. What exactly did he stand to gain by participating and opening himself up to further investigation into these murders? I just don't get it.
The dude is either stupid for doing this interview or he has balls of steel and really thinks that he is THAT good that he can sit there and lie and get away with it.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:07 pm to yurintroubl
quote:
Dude still makes collect calls from pay phones just because that's what he does.
That's not how I remember it. He made collect calls like that back in the 80s and 90s to the Durst organization, but I'm pretty sure he's got a cell phone now.
This post was edited on 3/16/15 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:10 pm to lsuwontonwrap
quote:
Um...the whole letter thing, for one.
Jarecki didn't screw him. He screwed himself.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:27 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
I can't wait to see what the new evidence is out of the LAPD. Because what they have now seems fairly thin in terms of reasonable doubt.
A confession is pretty strong.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:44 pm to northLAgoomba
quote:
He is stupid for participating in the series.
I'm sure his defense will say something along the lines of, "If he was guilty would he have participated in this interview? He did so because he had nothing to hide."
Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:49 pm to lsuwontonwrap
quote:
I supposed that the defense is going to argue that he can't get a fair trial because of the show.
So? Do you imagine you escape charges because of that?
quote:
The dude is either stupid for doing this interview or he has balls of steel and really thinks that he is THAT good that he can sit there and lie and get away with it.
He's a narcissist.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:50 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
When they first talked to that guy he said there was never more than 2 or 3 guilty votes while they deliberated. No way people are that stupid without getting paid.
Dick DeGuerin...he painted a story for the jury like Jareki did for us. He's probably the top defense attorney in TX, if not the nation. Justice can be bought...by paying top $ for an attorney.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:52 pm to lsuwontonwrap
quote:
Um...the whole letter thing, for one.
Screwing him, implies that he back stabbed him. Durst participated in a documentary about himself and the murders and lied. He was caught in his lies. That's not being "screwed" by anyone but himself.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:53 pm to Sayre
I'm glad Jarecki screwed him. The guy killed 3 people, he deserves to be behind bars and if it takes a documentary director to do a better job putting him there than the police, than so be it.
A part of me thinks the reason he did the interviews and wrote the cadaver letter is that it's all just a game to him. I think he kind of enjoys the attention and the rush it brings him of almost getting caught.
A part of me thinks the reason he did the interviews and wrote the cadaver letter is that it's all just a game to him. I think he kind of enjoys the attention and the rush it brings him of almost getting caught.
This post was edited on 3/16/15 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:54 pm to rlebl39
quote:
I'm glad Jarecki screwed him.
Except he didn't.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 5:57 pm to cwill
In a sense he kind of did because he trusted Jarecki to put his side of the story out there. That's why he contacted Jarecki to do it.
Whether he screwed him or not it doesn't matter, it's just how you look at it. The bottom line is that he murdered 3 people and he deserves to be in prison, whether it's by getting screwed over or not, it doesn't matter. I have no sympathy for a murderer.
Whether he screwed him or not it doesn't matter, it's just how you look at it. The bottom line is that he murdered 3 people and he deserves to be in prison, whether it's by getting screwed over or not, it doesn't matter. I have no sympathy for a murderer.
This post was edited on 3/16/15 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 3/16/15 at 6:00 pm to rlebl39
quote:
In a sense he kind of did because he trusted Jarecki to put his side of the story out there. That's why he contacted Jarecki to do it.
Whether he screwed him or not it doesn't matter, it's just how you look at it. The bottom line is that he murdered 3 people and he deserves to be in prison, whether it's by getting screwed over or not, it doesn't matter.
To screw someone is to cheat someone. Durst agreed to do interviews for a documentary about his life and view on the murders...if he "trusted" Jarecki that's his fault. He could have negotiated the entire interview and set ground rules, but all he said was he wanted to tell his story. His lawyer told him not to do it, because he knew, like nearly any breathing, rational human being would that once you started talking on tape you were in the process of screwing yourself.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 6:04 pm to cwill
I completely agree that he was an idiot for doing the interviews in the first place.
to me screwing someone over though is to leave someone in a bad situation. Which is exactly what happened. But durst did it all to himself, Jarecki just brought it all to light.
I'm very glad the interviews went the way they did. In this instance it's a great thing that Durst got "screwed over".
to me screwing someone over though is to leave someone in a bad situation. Which is exactly what happened. But durst did it all to himself, Jarecki just brought it all to light.
I'm very glad the interviews went the way they did. In this instance it's a great thing that Durst got "screwed over".
This post was edited on 3/16/15 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 3/16/15 at 6:10 pm to glassman
Couple things. First, there is SIGNIFICANT circumstantial evidence to convict him. Not just the letters, being in CA, motive, etc.
When he was arrested in New Orleans, he had checked into the hotel under a false name. shaved his head, and was carrying a revolver. Evidence of intent to flee. All admissible.
When he was arrested in New Orleans, he had checked into the hotel under a false name. shaved his head, and was carrying a revolver. Evidence of intent to flee. All admissible.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 6:14 pm to rlebl39
quote:
I completely agree that he was an idiot for doing the interviews in the first place.
He is the furthest thing from an idiot. He nearly got away with three murders and is clearly a sociopath/narcissist who thinks he is above normal societal norms. Even Jarecki was pulled in and I quote "liked the guy".
He is a ruthless and completely insane serial murderer. I truly wonder if there are other victims out there. The one thing he isn't is an idiot.
ETA: The one idiotic thing he did was to steal that chicken salad sub in Pennsylvania with cash in his wallet and almost 40K in cash in his car.
This post was edited on 3/16/15 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 3/16/15 at 6:16 pm to glassman
You can be smart and still be an idiot for doing something....
You're telling me doing an interview about 3 murders you got away with is a smart idea?
You're telling me doing an interview about 3 murders you got away with is a smart idea?
Page 11 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News