Started By
Message

re: Why a new dc hire is difficult

Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:07 am to
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29272 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:07 am to
quote:

New DC rarely bring their own staff.



chavis brought brick and cooper in 2009. good point.
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
16682 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:18 am to
Cooper and brick were also replacing coaches that had been fired. Chavis did not bring in coaches to replace established successful coaches as would be the case now. Little different scenario
Posted by airbornetiger
SATX
Member since Sep 2006
1416 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:31 am to
quote:

New DC rarely bring their own staff.



chavis brought brick and cooper in 2009. good point.



Do you LSU bro? Chavis "in theory" replaced the position Bo held that was temporarily "occupied" by Peveto and Mallory. So when these 2 "left for new jobs" 3 vacancies were created, which Chavis was able to fill with his guys as CLM deals very little with the D.

This was most the exception than the rule.
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4645 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:32 am to
quote:

chavis brought brick and cooper in 2009. good point
LSU had vacancies to full that year with co-DCs leaving.

I haven't seen where Will Muschamp or John Chavis has brought in new staff yet. Regardless, both of those are due to firings.

DCs usually bring in their own staff when the previous DC and staff was fired, not when the DC left voluntarily.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram